121
what if? (files.catbox.moe)
submitted 1 year ago by yamapikariya@lemmyfi.com to c/memes@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago

What keeps individuals from benefiting from society without contributing to it? Who determines appropriate contributions? I don't know if you can do that in an anarchical framework

[-] animist@lemmy.one 11 points 1 year ago

The community itself would make those decisions in a way that works for them. Us telling them in the future now from the past how to live their lives is tyrannical

[-] El_Rocha@lm.put.tf 0 points 1 year ago

How would the community make the decisions? Would everyone have to vote on every issue that appears?

[-] Si_sierra@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago

You do this already. If you are part of a church or friend group or organisation or whatever, you usually sort out issues when they come up by talking to one another. Saying people are going to vote is a weird framing of normal collaboration, because most of the time we agree on decisions by talking and compromising

[-] El_Rocha@lm.put.tf 2 points 1 year ago

I do agree in the small scale it works (ex: small village). But I don't agree it scales to society as a whole.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2023
121 points (75.5% liked)

Memes

45200 readers
2073 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS