this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2024
259 points (91.4% liked)

cats

19271 readers
1355 users here now

typical internet cats. videos, pics, memes welcome!

rule 1) be kind

lemmy.world rules:

other cat communities midwest.social cats

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Found this one online while browsing for what cats shouldn't eat. However I feel like this area is quite controversial and opinionated. Also feels like half the websites are written by AI and riddled with ads. So if anyone has a good source as to what cats should avoid then let me know.

Anyways, I found this nice illustration, but wanted to hear with you peeps whether you have any experience regarding these food items.

Also what's your take on milk/sour milk for cats? My previous cat loved it so much, and she aged until she was 17 years old, and never seemed to have a problem with it. Also asked the vet at the time and she said it was OK. However every other website I visit tell to never give milk(dairy) to cats. So which is it? Does it just depend on the cat?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Nacktmull@lemmy.world 49 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (16 children)

That list gets a few details right but is also full of nonsense. Grain is not appropriate food for cats. Fruit and anything else that contains sugar is also not appropriate. High quality cat food with at least 90 percent meat and no grain, no sugar is best. I sometimes serve fresh meat and fish too, like chicken hearts or cod. Just make sure there are no bones or bone fragments in the meat or fish and also that it has been frozen to make sure there is no risk of any infection.

Edit: removed a few details which I am not sure about

[–] Kacarott@feddit.de 17 points 8 months ago (9 children)

I'm not sure the sugar argument holds, plenty of animals naturally eat foods with sugar, and do not brush their teeth. Of course they don't eat nearly as much sugar as a typical human, but that doesn't mean that sugar should always be avoided.

For cats specifically though I am not sure, maybe all sugar is bad, but I don't think it's because of teeth brushing.

[–] FermiEstimate@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago (2 children)

It's worth noting that cats are unlikely to be able to perceive sweet tastes. So while sugar is not toxic to cats, there's not really any benefit to letting them have it, even as a treat.

On a related note, there's a hypothesis that the mutation that caused them to lose the ability to taste sweet things in cat ancestors is what led to them becoming obligate carnivores, which is kind of interesting.

[–] xkforce@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Then why the hell did one of my cats LOVE cantaloupe?

[–] FermiEstimate@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Heh, I knew a cat that would go through a pan of unseasoned cauliflower if you weren't careful. Maybe every cat is born knowing something they have no clear way of understanding, like how tasteless things are food or how to move in four dimensions or what electronics are.

More seriously, the article I linked to suggests cats can taste things we can't, so that's a possibility.

[–] xkforce@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

It could also be she was just a different sort of cat. She had 7 toe beans per foot and was a blue eyed tortois shell. So her liking cantaloupe was probably the least weird thing about her

[–] Nacktmull@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (3 children)

I heard and read several times now that cats can not taste sweetness and that sugar is bad for cats. At the same time most low to medium priced cat foods have added sugar. I find it confusing and wonder why manufacturers do that.

[–] Perfide@reddthat.com 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

It's filler. They can't taste it, and it's nutritionally void for them, but it's still calories, and sugar is cheap.

Edit:spelling

[–] growsomethinggood@reddthat.com 1 points 8 months ago

I'd bet it's because sugar is still calories even if you can't taste it. So, filler

[–] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Because manufacturers only care about making something that's just not poisonous enough to kill your pets.

Hell some of them don't even care about that when it comes to flea meds

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)