184

This is from last month, but I haven't seen any discussion of it. Seems like Forgejo is now a hard fork of Gitea, instead of being a soft fork like it was over the previous year.

The main reason I'm posting it now is this: "As such, if you were considering upgrading to Forgejo, we encourage you to do that sooner rather than later, because as the projects naturally diverge further, doing so will become ever harder. It will not happen overnight, it may not even happen soon, but eventually, Forgejo will stop being a drop-in replacement."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ikidd@lemmy.world 30 points 7 months ago

So, why Forgejo over Gitea? I've been pretty happy with Gitea.

[-] mholiv@lemmy.world 98 points 7 months ago

Because gitea is fully the victim of corporate capture. Any PRs that make gitea better in a way that would reduce the main corporate “sponsor” profit are rejected.

The company has a conflict of interest with the community and it shows. Forgejo is sponsored by a non profit open source cooperative.

[-] ikidd@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

Interesting. Is there a migration path?

[-] rjc@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago

If you deployed with docker composr you just change the image and hit redeploy. Super simple.

[-] ikidd@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

Appreciate that, sounds super easy

[-] nadir@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

It is. Did that when this was first announced

[-] ikidd@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Huh, using their instructions for docker compose, I use docker pull codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo:7.0.0 and it errors for manifest unknown. Removing the version tag so it default to latest doesn't help.

Do I need to make an account and docker login? That seems like it should be unnecessary for a simple pull.

[-] chameleon@kbin.social 2 points 7 months ago

Login isn't necessary, but there is no :latest tag published so you need to pull a version that exists. The current version is at codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo:1.21.8-0 or at :1.21 if you want one that tracks patch updates (as found in the container registry).

[-] ikidd@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

Ah, the docs reference V.7.0.0 so that's what I was trying with.

TY, that got her transitioned. The config actually pops a notice that 1.21.9 is available but I don't see that it's in the registry yet. I do like the :latest tag because then I can use watchtower, but I can understand why some people would want to specify the version.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)
load more comments (20 replies)
this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2024
184 points (96.0% liked)

Selfhosted

39905 readers
317 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS