this post was submitted on 02 May 2024
22 points (95.8% liked)

Proton

5262 readers
15 users here now

Empowering you to choose a better internet where privacy is the default. Protect yourself online with Proton Mail, Proton VPN, Proton Calendar, Proton Drive. Proton Pass and SimpleLogin.

Proton Mail is the world's largest secure email provider. Swiss, end-to-end encrypted, private, and free.

Proton VPN is the world’s only open-source, publicly audited, unlimited and free VPN. Swiss-based, no-ads, and no-logs.

Proton Calendar is the world's first end-to-end encrypted calendar that allows you to keep your life private.

Proton Drive is a free end-to-end encrypted cloud storage that allows you to securely backup and share your files. It's open source, publicly audited, and Swiss-based.

Proton Pass Proton Pass is a free and open-source password manager which brings a higher level of security with rigorous end-to-end encryption of all data (including usernames, URLs, notes, and more) and email alias support.

SimpleLogin lets you send and receive emails anonymously via easily-generated unique email aliases.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

There's a button to "sort" folders in the settings which sorts the currently existing folders alphabetically. Then when you create a new folder it gets put at the bottom. Can we just have them sort alphabetically automatically?

Also when you click sort, it only sorts the top-level folders. The subfolders don't get sorted at all.

This is the kind of rough-around-the-edges stuff that Proton really needs to sort out before adding more and more services.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ledivin@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (8 children)

The sort button absolutely shouldn't sort subfolders. I do think there should be an option to always automatically sort alphabetically, though

[–] akilou@sh.itjust.works 0 points 6 months ago (7 children)

Why shouldn't subfolders be alphabetical? It's logical.

[–] alex_herrero@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Because people could want them in a specific manual order other than using the alphabet. Well, you could put a number as prefix to order them, I know, just pointing the fact.

[–] akilou@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 months ago (3 children)

But that same logic should apply to top level folders. It doesn't make sense to on have some folders alphabetized but not others.

[–] Iapar@feddit.de 1 points 6 months ago

There should be an option for the cascading sorting but it shouldn't be default. I want to change the things I am interacting with in that moment and not something way down. Maybe there was a reason not to sort it alphabetical.

[–] thisisdee@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

But folders organize different things and depending on what type of organization it is, I’d want things sorted differently

[–] Ledivin@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

If you have chosen to sort a subfolder, or if you use an option like "always sort," then I agree. But if you just happen to be at the top level folder, I don't think subfolders should be sorted when you click "sort," because they may be in an order that you want and sorting is an action that shouldn't be destructive (unless intentionally destructive).

[–] Broken@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 months ago

Numbering the folders isn't dynamic though. If you add a folder later you might need to rename others, which is annoying in itself but then would break any filters applied to them too. I'd rather just organize them as I want manually. It's not hard to drag and drop them.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)