169
submitted 4 months ago by marathon@lemmy.ca to c/fediverse@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Microw@lemm.ee 39 points 4 months ago

He was on the board, it's not like it was his project or anything. Imo he wanted to create a protocol, not a platform. "Improve Activitypub" like they always claimed. But then Bluesky realized that they can simply build their own platform and be Twitter 2.0

[-] heluecht@pirati.ca 2 points 4 months ago

@Microw @dumbass No. He wouldn't be happy with ActivityPub as well. He imagines a social network where no one can perform any moderation. He favours Nostr for exactly that reason. Bluesky has got moderation (just like the Fediverse) - which he dislikes.

[-] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 months ago

Moderation should always be client side. Server side should not be able to interfere or even read public content

[-] marathon@lemmy.ca -2 points 3 months ago

Moderation should always be client side. Server side should not be able to interfere or even read public content

Yup. I don't know if I agree re public content, but perhaps private messages should be encrypted, client side, before sending? That issue is one that bothers me about Mastodon.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
this post was submitted on 11 May 2024
169 points (90.8% liked)

Fediverse

17541 readers
1 users here now

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".

Getting started on Fediverse;

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS