this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2024
144 points (97.4% liked)

Technology

59190 readers
2588 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 19 points 5 months ago (8 children)

TL;DR: the total energy produced by humanity in a year.

Or if you want to do it in let's say 20 years, 5% of the total power output.

[–] SomeGuy69@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago (5 children)
[–] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago (4 children)

Technically yes, but politicians start freaking out as it would lower GDP a few percent too.

[–] Galapagon@sh.itjust.works 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I think the technical term is: But muh ecomnomie!

[–] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

They're going to say that anyway when the real cost of warming hits. Calculation about that says GDP -30% to -50%. But that's for the next legislature I guess.

[–] realitista@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yes, for politicians the cost is always lower to kick the can into the next administration's term. Unfortunately it becomes more and more expensive for the rest of us.

[–] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

In the end, they'll have kicked so many cans down the road that the huge pile is blocking the way.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)