There are plenty of Democrats in Congress that would like to continue to improve healthcare, but the Dems don’t have the numbers - particularly in the House - to pass further reform.

So you're saying therenis both "plenty" but also "not enough"?

That doesn't make logical sense to me...

I'm saying not everyone Dem in office really wants to fix healthcare, as evident as there seems to always be just enough against progress to stop progress.

And that logically it's a safe assumption there's even more that would oppose progress if they had to, they just don't want to publicly oppose it unless they're forced to.

So we basically have two choices.

1. Be reactive and keep assuming every Dem supports the party platform until they personally pull a Joe Manchin

2. Be proactive and make sure the people on our team our really on our team before we have to rely on them. So that when we have the House, Senate, and presidency we can accomplish stuff.

But if you want to talk politics and healthcare, there’s one party that’s made any real effort at improvement in the last 2 decades, and it’s the Democrats.

And they got a more conservative version of Mitt Romney's plan passed...

And have spent over a decade opposi g we improve it up to at least where the Republican presidential candidate was 16 years ago...

That's not enough dawg

Voters want more, they deserve more. So why not give voters a candidate that agrees so that we can easily prevent fascists from getting elected?

I don't see any downsides to the Dem party running Dem politicians that agree with Dem voters.