this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2024
636 points (95.4% liked)

Greentext

6619 readers
1474 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 86 points 1 year ago (13 children)

I remember CRTs being washed out, heavy, power hungry, loud, hot, susceptible to burn-in and magnetic fields... The screen has to have a curve, so over ~16" and you get weird distortions. You needed a real heavy and sturdy desk to keep them from wobbling. Someone is romanticizing an era that no one liked. I remember the LCD adoption being very quick and near universal as far as tech advancements go.

[–] Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone 37 points 1 year ago (6 children)

As someone who still uses a CRT for specific uses, I feel that you're misremembering the switch over from CRT to LCD. At the time, LCD were blurry and less vibrant than CRT. Technical advancements have solved this over time.

Late model CRTs were even flat to eliminate the distortion you're describing.

[–] Pulptastic@midwest.social 15 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I had a flat CRT. It was even heavier than a regular one.

[–] Soggytoast@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They're under a pretty high vacuum inside, so the flat glass has to be thicker to be strong enough

[–] Pulptastic@midwest.social 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah I suspect there's some lensing going on in there too which adds more weight.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)