this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2024
443 points (94.4% liked)

People Twitter

5197 readers
559 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
SendMeYourTaTas@sh.itjust.works
pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
443
Guess he gets twitter/X idk (lemmy.world)
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by Varven@lemmy.world to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works
58 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 5 points 4 months ago (3 children)

There's no consideration specified, so it's not really a contract in normal terms.

It is however a last will and testament for disposal of his asset(s).

[–] SleepingLesson@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (2 children)

This is not at all a will and testimate.

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Depends on the jurisdiction. Some states recognise "nuncupative" and "holographic" wills.

Other jurisdictions recognise any "speech" that details disposal of assets upon death as a will.

[–] SleepingLesson@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

There is no jurisdiction in which the facts of this situation would constitute a binding will.

The circumstances in which a will can be formed orally are death-bed situations where formation of a proper will are impractical.