Technology

59404 readers

2021 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

545

Google’s carbon emissions soar by 48% due to AI (www.climateaction.org)

submitted 4 months ago by 0x815@feddit.org to c/technology@lemmy.world

64 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The leap in emissions is largely due to energy-guzzling data centers and supply chain emissions necessary to power artificial intelligence (AI) systems such as Google’s Gemini and OpenAI’s ChatGPT. The report estimated that in 2023, Google’s data centers alone account for up to 10% of global data center electricity consumption. Their data center electricity and water consumption both increased 17% between 2022 and 2023.

Google released 14.3 million metric tons of carbon dioxide just last year, 13% higher than the year before.

Climate scientists have shown concerns as Big Tech giants such as Google, Amazon and Microsoft continue to invest billons of dollars into AI.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] nivenkos@lemmy.ml 6 points 4 months ago (15 children)

The answer is nuclear power.

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 42 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (8 children)

Or how about cutting back on the idiotic and venal misuse of poorly-developed AI?

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 4 months ago (2 children)

there are still going to be a lot of people who need power though. Cutting the US of AI isn't going to magically remove coal plants from the grid, it's going to do nothing actually. We need to be building new plants, period.

[–] mindlesscrollyparrot@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

We need to be transitioning to zero carbon as fast as possible, period, and even that isn't good enough. Moderating our energy consumption is vital. There is a cliff at the end of the road and business as usual means driving on down the road.

I am not saying that we need to turn off our lights and heating. I am saying that we first-worlders use a lot of power on frivolous things that we absolutely can live without.

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 months ago

i don't fundamentally disagree with you, but you need to recognize this includes a global perspective. You think china is going to 1/10th is electricity consumption in 20 years? Fuck no.

You think russia is going to do this? It probably won't entirely out of spite for NATO.

we can focus on this in america, locally, but we need to be in a position to be capable of doing it first. Notably, having a green grid would be a good start. Or at least, an increasingly green grid, which we do currently have, though not to a massively significant degree.

Also, i didn't realize i had such a good oneliner "The US of AI" what a fucking statement lmao. I'm sure i meant this as "removing AI from the US" but it sounds funnier the other way.

load more comments (5 replies)

load more comments (11 replies)