225
submitted 2 months ago by phneutral@feddit.org to c/energy@slrpnk.net

The head of the Australian energy market operator AEMO, Daniel Westerman, has rejected nuclear power as a way to replace Australia's ageing coal-fired power stations, arguing that it is too slow and too expensive. In addition, baseload power sources are not competitive in a grid dominated by wind and solar energy anyway.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] kaffiene@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

Except you have no emperical basis for judging the accuracy of those odds.

[-] PixelatedSaturn@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Actually I do. Simply look at injured people because of nuclear power and compare them to injured people because of any alternative.

[-] kaffiene@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

Irrelevant to storing nuclear waste for 10000 years, which was what I was talking avout

[-] PixelatedSaturn@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

That's like saying we don't know if the sun will come up tomorrow, because we can't see in the future.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2024
225 points (94.5% liked)

Green Energy

2122 readers
112 users here now

everything about energy production

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS