49
nut_webgui v0.3.1, Light-weight NUT web GUI
(github.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2024
49 points (94.5% liked)
Selfhosted
39905 readers
317 users here now
A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.
Rules:
-
Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
-
No spam posting.
-
Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.
-
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.
-
Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).
-
No trolling.
Resources:
- selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
- awesome-selfhosted software
- awesome-sysadmin resources
- Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting
Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.
Questions? DM the mods!
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
How does this compare to Peanut ?
Biggest difference is being able to execute INSTCMD commands, at least that was the main reason why I developed my own tool. Another less important differences are: older ARM support and since it's written in Rust, it's much more efficient in terms of resource usage. TBH, being that efficient only makes sense for very low-power devices.
Besides that, I don't think you can go wrong with either project.
Thanks for the reply, sounds compelling. I'm running peanut currently and have been happy with it, but I might power out down and give this a spin. Low resource usage sounds like a nice selling point.
Thanks for your contribution!