this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2024
86 points (93.0% liked)

Games

32545 readers
2034 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Whelp...I'm out. (I expected this to happen before they said anything though, honestly.)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mox@lemmy.sdf.org 51 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (19 children)

Kernel mode anti-cheat guarantees I will never buy your game. Not even as a gift for someone else.

Assurances like "we will never abuse this power" are laughably unrealistic, and even if they defied the history of humanity and somehow turned out to be true, that issue is made irrelevant by additional realities:

  1. The risks come not only from corporate abuse of power, but also from vulnerabilities in their code that will eventually be exploited by third parties.
  2. Beyond the risk of nosy corporations snooping on users' private information, there are major security risks. An exploit at the kernel level means game over for the integrity of your entire system, all the data on it or passing through it, and every other system accessed from it. Bank accounts, for example.
  3. Client-side anti-cheat is conceptually wrong thinking and doomed to fail. Even at the kernel level, it's an arms race. Cheaters will find ways to weaken or circumvent it (such as running cheats on an external device that captures game video and generates input events) or even defeat it completely.

I guess this incredibly invasive and fundamentally flawed attempt to manage cheating might be acceptable to someone whose computer is used for nothing else but playing that game... —shrug— ...but for me, it's a hard nope.

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 21 points 3 months ago (18 children)

Not only that, but cheating isn't exactly a huge problem in this genre, so it's a heavy handed solution already and one that's even less necessary to consider.

[–] Ashtear@lemm.ee 16 points 3 months ago (2 children)

This likely has less to do with cheating and more to do with making sure players use the game shop, whether it's blocking third-party skins or bots that automate currency grinds.

[–] RarePossum@programming.dev 1 points 3 months ago

I mean league still allows 3rd party skins, like the devs told the skin makers what guidelines to follow and they probably wouldn't get hit

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)