8
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by floofloof@lemmy.ca to c/science@lemmy.ml

Edit: The paper is total nonsense. Sorry for wasting people's time.

https://youtu.be/Yk_NjIPaZk4?si=dasxM2Py-s654djW

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] thundermoose@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

The math here is beyond me, but this statement from the paper seems contradictory:

The obtained equation is covariant in space–time and invariant with respect to any Planck scale. Therefore, the constants of the universe can be reduced to only two quantities: Planck length and Planck time.

Planck time is derived from the speed of light and the gravitational constant. So wouldn't there be at least four universal constants?

[-] MossyFeathers@pawb.social 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

If a constant is defined by another constant, without a variable between, wouldn't it be fair to simplify that into a single constant? Additionally, based solely on the article, it almost sounds like they're inverting that, saying that Planck time and Planck length determine the speed of light and gravitational constant(?).

load more comments (1 replies)
this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2024
8 points (55.7% liked)

Science

13139 readers
8 users here now

Subscribe to see new publications and popular science coverage of current research on your homepage


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS