this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2024
-39 points (28.1% liked)

Technology

59378 readers
3129 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (14 children)

I mostly agree with what you are saying but I do think sourcing it ethically is a pipe dream.

It's impossible to get all that data from individuals, it's way too complicated. What's already happening is the websites are selling the data and they all have it in their terms of service that they can, even Cara the supposedly pro artist website.

The individuals are not getting compensated and all regulations proposed are aimed at making this the only option. If companies have to pay for all that data while Google and Microsoft are paying premiums to have exclusive access, the open source scene dies overnight.

It really seems to me like there's a media campaign being run to poison the general populations sentiment so AI companies can turn to the government and say "see, we want regulations, the public wants regulations, it's a win win". It's regulatory capture.

I'm also pro piracy and use it myself for all my media. I still consider it theft even if moral but I understand your point about it stealing from artist. I just don't think any current regulation will help artists. Personally, I advocate for copy left licenses for anything that uses public data but I sadly have never seen any proposed law or government document mention it.

[–] GroupNebula563@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (5 children)

I also agree that ethical sourcing is pretty ridiculous given real world constraints, but I'm holding out hope that someone figures it out.

[–] JustARaccoon@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (4 children)

It's not hard to figure out, it's just not economically viable to set up a system for it when the alternative is just not worrying about ethics and doing it anyway. We struggle to get companies to pay slightly more for recycled plastic than virgin plastic, this isn't any different.

[–] GroupNebula563@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

By "figure it out" I meant "figure out a way to get big companies on board"

[–] JustARaccoon@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You do that by banning or disincentivising the less ethical option, the moment it's less economically viable, they'll pivot, unless it isn't an option.

[–] GroupNebula563@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The problem being, how do we get it banned?

[–] JustARaccoon@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Extend GDPR or create a similar framework. It's also why I said "or disincentivising", if we can make it a good pr move to license from artists and provide a system to do so through easily while admonishing companies that don't use it we could get the bad pr to be too much compared to weaseling around the licensing

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)