this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2024
691 points (97.5% liked)

People Twitter

5226 readers
1100 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] derf82@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago (5 children)

No medieval city claims that. Hell, they are more walkable and transit oriented than more modern cities that were designed for cars. Stop with the straw men.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (4 children)

No medieval city claims that.

Its a common enough argument in the UK. I've even seen a few instances in which bus stops have been taken down because people were complaining about the traffic they created (small street with no passing lane, so when the bus stops, the dozen cars behind it are bottled up).

None of the busybodies trying to sabotage the local transit system seems to want to recognize the twelve cars behind the bus as the problem, of course.

[–] derf82@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Saying they don’t like the location of a bus stop is not saying you can’t have busses.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 1 month ago

It's also not true. Don't know any towns in the UK that don't have buses and use small streets as an excuse.

Most of the towns in the UK that don't have buses use lack of funding from central government as an excuse, which is a pretty good excuse.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)