this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2024
48 points (71.1% liked)

Solarpunk

5492 readers
2 users here now

The space to discuss Solarpunk itself and Solarpunk related stuff that doesn't fit elsewhere.

What is Solarpunk?

Join our chat: Movim or XMPP client.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
SteveKLord@slrpnk.net
ex_06@slrpnk.net
poVoq@slrpnk.net
48
Yes, Actually, Individual Responsibility Is Essential to Solving the Climate Crisis (www.sierraclub.org)
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by stabby_cicada@slrpnk.net to c/solarpunk@slrpnk.net
95 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

A fixation on system change alone opens the door to a kind of cynical self-absolution that divorces personal commitment from political belief. This is its own kind of false consciousness, one that threatens to create a cheapened climate politics incommensurate with this urgent moment.

[...]

Because here’s the thing: When you choose to eat less meat or take the bus instead of driving or have fewer children, you are making a statement that your actions matter, that it’s not too late to avert climate catastrophe, that you have power. To take a measure of personal responsibility for climate change doesn’t have to distract from your political activism—if anything, it amplifies it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] UsernameHere@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (3 children)

No one said consumers are free of all responsibility.

No one said “oh that Exxon, smh”.

Trying to fix climate change by reducing individual carbon footprint doesn’t work because there are a lot of people that:

  1. don’t have the luxury of being able to not use gasoline or solar.

  2. Don’t care

  3. It requires 100% of the world population to take it upon themselves to do the right thing just to fix the smallest part of the problem.

Fixing it with voting/protest reduces emissions for everyone. The rich, poor, industrial emissions, commercial emissions. All emissions.

[–] UnityDevice@startrek.website -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

smallest part of the problem

This is what I'm trying to get across to you here. You've posted the same notion multiple times in this thread. The consumer share isn't the smallest part, it's most of it. All the oil we extract serves to make products, transport products, sell products to the consumer - you. It's not being being burnt for fun.

When you engage in consumption, any amount of it, you're pulling a string connected to a million other strings that mostly end up in an oil well one way or another. The luxury you speak of is in that consumption, not the lack of it.

And if you think otherwise, compare your lifestyle, your lifelong level of comfort to that of someone who spent their whole life living in a hut in Mali, whose lifelong emissions equal a few months worth of yours. Now try to tell that person that you're not responsible for the gas you burn, it's the fault of those that provided you with the option to do it. It's insulting.

[–] UsernameHere@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] UnityDevice@startrek.website 0 points 1 month ago

Please tell me, when it says "Transportation" on that chart, what exactly do you think is being transported, and where?