this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2025
198 points (99.0% liked)

politics

19366 readers
2235 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In 2022 we learned that Biden called Rupert Murdoch the most dangerous man in the world. This article written in 2023 backs up Biden's assertion with lots of evidence. I know the article is slightly old but I haven't seen this posted here yet.

Here's an article about Biden calling Murdoch the most dangerous man: https://edition.cnn.com/2022/04/03/media/reliable-sources-biden-murdoch-fox-news/index.html

top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Omgboom@lemmy.zip 49 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Certainly one of the biggest pieces of shit in the world

[–] jimmy90@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

really hoping he dies soon

[–] stiephelando@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] jimmy90@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

And hopefully takes his empire down with him

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Tick tock, asshole.

Not that another asshole won't replace him.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 23 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yes he is. But if he wasn't, someone else would be. The point being the only way these pieces of shit are allowed any power is because we don't understand - as a populace - how media works. It's not part of our processing of input. And so, propaganda works, it can't be countered and the only way to defeat it will never be taught.

[–] WeUnite@lemm.ee 10 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Yes, we need stronger broadcast regulations and schools must do their best to equip students with the ability to recognize disinformation. Efforts in teaching won't be perfect especially at first but we must make progress.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

And as a society we just voted against all that. YAY!!!!

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Sadly, we've been saying this for 50 years. Outlook not so good.

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 3 points 2 days ago

Look how long it took for (most) slavery to be abolished. Don't give up so easily, then they win.

[–] Goodmorningsunshine@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, Outlook sucks, but why the tangent?

[–] TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Man, these old heartless fucks just won't die. Part of me thinks we have shot ourselves in the foot coming out with the vaccine so quickly. Maybe if we would have let COVID cook a little longer we could have shaken off a few of these parasites.

[–] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Good news!
Covid had a peak mortality rate of about 3%
Bird Flu has a mortality rate of about 56%
And most cases at the moment come from unpasteurized milk, which his buddy RFK jr promotes to Fox News fans (MAGA idiots).
If it stays the way it is with no person-to-person transmission they'll thin themselves out pretty quickly.

[–] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The evil don't follow the advice they give to the masses.

[–] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

True, but the masses that vote for them do.
No voters = no power

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago

One of. But fighting for the top.

[–] Zombifrog@lemm.ee 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] dwemthy@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Probably read it before it was done

[–] kipo@lemm.ee 1 points 3 days ago

The Adjuster has entered the chat

Totally edited. I thought it was about the stock guy.