this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2023
633 points (92.6% liked)

Technology

59554 readers
2984 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Meta sparks privacy fears after unveiling $299 Smart Glasses with hidden cameras: ‘You can now film everyone without them knowing’::These stylish shades may look like a regular pair of Ray-Ban Wayfarers, but they're actually Meta's new Smart Glasses, complete with two tiny cameras and speakers implanted in the arms. The wearable tech was unveiled by Mark Zuckerberg Wednesday at the 2023 Meta Connect conference in Menlo Park, California, sparking a frenzy online.

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tabular@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

On the one hand I can't remember the many people I see at work and would love heads-up display saying names, birthdays and reminding me what we spoke about.

On the other hand I don't like cameras recording my socially embarrassing actions in the first place, let alone tell people who I am. Like hell I want Zuck to know what stupid shit I said 4 years ago to that one person I won't see ever again.

[–] AwesomeSteve@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Out of the loop, do you need a facebook/meta account (if yes, how much info they requested) to use the glasses ?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They should have used a photo from a webcam or old phone (or a noise filter) to better represent the nighttime quality of the tiny lenses. This one seems to have real DSLR depth of field. The interface is obviously fake, too. As a journalist, I would go the extra mile to take (or license) a shitty picture/video frame with motion blur (and no good-looking subject) and edit it into the supplied promotional material rather than plainly repost that obviously fake shit.

[–] Sabre363@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Didn't Google already try this?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Hovenko@iusearchlinux.fyi 3 points 1 year ago (5 children)

What about adding some strong infrareds on your hat?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

And in a future America, Joe Hillbilly shot Stylo Man, because Joe suspected Stylo to spy on him with his funny looking (but otherwise totally ordinary) glasses.

[–] atk007@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Now I have a fear of being filmed while scratching my nuts.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ram@bookwormstory.social 3 points 1 year ago

hidden camera prank videos are about to become a lot more rampant I think.

[–] photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Idk, I assume I'm being watched via CCTV at least wherever I go nowadays. This may be literally in your face, but still... these devices will become invisible and ubiquitous.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›