this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2025
300 points (99.3% liked)

World News

40018 readers
2831 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

The World Health Organization (WHO) is freezing recruitment, restricting travel, and cutting expenses following the U.S. withdrawal, its largest funding source.

WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus warned staff of worsening financial pressures and announced measures such as limiting technical missions, virtual-only meetings, renegotiating contracts, and halting office refurbishments.

Critics, like global health consultant Fifa Rahman, say the U.S. move harms global health preparedness.

Italy's Deputy PM Matteo Salvini has also proposed withdrawing from the WHO, though Italy’s Prime Minister has not taken a stance.

top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org 104 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Just in time for the next pandemic.

[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 24 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Based on the year’s start, we are indeed heading for 2020 vol. 2

[–] blazeknave@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

At least they squeezed the remaining disposable income generated by wfh so nobody kids themselves with creature comfort

[–] Mysticpickle@lemmy.cafe 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

On a purely selfish angle, the pandemic was a pretty great time for me. Folks respecting personal space, fewer social obligations to meet, watching the "it's just a flu" people drop like flies in /r/HermanCainAward. I personally wouldn't mind another round :o

[–] ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 4 days ago

Folks respecting personal space

There was a running joke in Finland, where people try to stay as far away from other human beings as possible:

"COVID is terrible: now we have to maintain a 2-meter social distance when it was 6 meters before!

[–] Jollyllama@lemmy.world 37 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Wasn't Trump concerned the WHO was China run? Cutting funding means China will have an even larger influence.

[–] Eximius@lemmy.world 18 points 5 days ago

It's some kind of intense mental gymnastics to think the Trump administration has a thought process behind their policies...........

[–] luciferofastora@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 days ago

"China runs it? I want nothing to do with it!"

Stupid, to be sure, but he's not running on rational, but emotional reasoning.

[–] mat@jlai.lu 82 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Just in time for an avian flu :)

[–] I_Miss_Daniel@lemmy.world 30 points 6 days ago

Tweet becomes X. (because the bird died.)

[–] TimboSlice@discuss.online 45 points 6 days ago

If only the next pandemic could kill off just the Trump voters..

[–] john89@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Err... why weren't they doing virtual meeting already?

[–] locuester@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 days ago (2 children)

That’s not near as fun as traveling the world for free!

[–] SoftTeeth@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

Except for when they're conducting viral research and stopping global pandemics.

Bad take for the people who keep us from killing ourselves.

[–] john89@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 days ago

Great point.

[–] Eezyville@sh.itjust.works 16 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Well, this is what happens when you depend too much on the US. Maybe they'll learn their lesson and rely more on other countries.

[–] ribboo@lemm.ee 12 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Any organization or company losing their by far largest member / customer will be severely affected. Not all to much to learn from that, if they weren’t - they’d be running the organization like morons.

[–] Eezyville@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Trump was elected in 2016 and it was a crazy time. WHO should have been on notice then. Don't rely on the US. Have contingency plans because the American people voted for this guy. Now he's back.

[–] ribboo@lemm.ee 2 points 5 days ago

It sounds like they are exercising their contingency plan

[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 10 points 5 days ago (1 children)

In the past, the US was a country that could be depended on. The last 10 years have shown that to no longer be true.

I think the US will be going downhill in terms of international standing over the next few decades.

[–] Spzi@lemm.ee 6 points 5 days ago

For sure, a less reliable partner is a less valuable partner. That's one way to lose your geopolitical influence.

[–] Gympie_Gympie_pie@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

You don’t understand how this things work, clearly

[–] Eezyville@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 days ago

Why don't you educate me.