A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!
1. Be Civil
You may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.
2. No hate speech
Don't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.
3. Don't harass people
Don't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.
4. Stay on topic
This community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.
5. No reposts
Do not repost content that has already been posted in this community.
Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.
In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:
Those streets are wide enough to have parking on both sides and keep the bike lanes. Or they should just turn it into a living street or shared space since it’s a residential area anyway. Then there is no need for bike lanes, but cars have to drive slower and share the road with cyclists and pedestrians. Bet that would get pushback as well since these car brains want to drive 60 trough residential streets.
The worst possible bike lanes are those that run along the door zone of parked cars. The living street option is far better.
We once again limit our transportation options down to the worst one, so that society at large can pay the storage cost of automobiles.
What a short sighted move.
Car brains go brrrr
Article not found.