this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2025
334 points (99.7% liked)

Gaming

2812 readers
553 users here now

The Lemmy.zip Gaming Community

For news, discussions and memes!


Community Rules

This community follows the Lemmy.zip Instance rules, with the inclusion of the following rule:

You can see Lemmy.zip's rules by going to our Code of Conduct.

What to Expect in Our Code of Conduct:


If you enjoy reading legal stuff, you can check it all out at legal.lemmy.zip.


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] zipzoopaboop@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 2 hours ago

Doesn't mean much without validation

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 21 points 9 hours ago

Good shit. A carefully thought out handcrafted experience will always be better than interactive slop.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 15 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Reminds me of the 70s when suddenly everything was "Eco-Friendly".

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 6 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (2 children)

I remember an old song "I'll go green when they go green and they'll go green but not really green more like aquamarine" and it appears to no longer exist on the internet.

Another song I can't find is about a guy who tells the story of all his past lives and in each he was a whore and someday he'll be a whore again.

Really wish songs would stop disappearing.

[–] mke@programming.dev 2 points 3 hours ago

Yours is the most captivating comment in this entire thread.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

I have to admit neither one of those rings a bell.

[–] Zexks@lemmy.world 40 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Lmao. The “organic” labeling has made it to electronics.

[–] steal_your_face@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 hours ago

Certified Artisanally Hand-Crafter Code

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RizzoTheSmall@lemm.ee 39 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

They cannot possibly assure customers that remote devs aren't using copilots to help them code.

[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 7 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Generative AI is a technology that can create pictures, movies, audio (music or voice action) and writing using artificial intelligence

By their definition of Gen AI, it's unclear to me if the label says anything about code. I'm not sure I would consider it "writing."

[–] mke@programming.dev 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

This might be a little off-topic, but I've noticed what seems to be a trend of anti-AI discourse ignoring programmers. Protect artists, writers, animators, actors, voice-actors... programmers, who? No idea if it's because they're partly to blame, or people are simply unaware code is also stolen by AI companies—still waiting on that GitHub Copilot lawsuit—but the end result appears to be a general lack of care about GenAI in coding.

[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I think it's because most programmers use and appreciate the tool. This might change once programmers start to blame gen AI for not having a job anymore.

[–] mke@programming.dev 3 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

There remains a significant enclave that rejects it, but yeah, it's definitely smaller than equivalent groups in other mentioned professions. Hopefully things won't get that far. I think the tech is amazing, but it's an immense shame that so many of my/our peers don't give a flying fuck about ethics.

[–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 2 hours ago

There remains a significant enclave that rejects it, but yeah, it's definitely smaller than equivalent groups in other mentioned professions.

Reporting in.

I think the tech is amazing, but it's an immense shame that so many of my/our peers don't give a flying fuck about ethics.

Yup. Very much agreed here. There are some uses that are acceptable but it's a but hard to say that any are ethical due to the ethically bankrupt foundations of its training data.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Indie studio teams are pretty small so its possible, I personally hate that the word copilot ever even appears and never ever autogen code, but moreso I'm sure the stamp refers to art, texture, and sound.

[–] bia@lemmy.world 34 points 17 hours ago (25 children)

Not sure how to interpret this. The use of any tool can be for good or bad.

If the quality of the game is increased by the use of AI, I'm all for it. If it's used to generate a generic mess, it's probably not going to be interesting enough for me to notice it's existence.

If they mean that they don't use AI to generate art and voice over, I guess it can be good for a medium to large game. But if using AI means it gets made at all, that's better no?

[–] 10001110101@lemm.ee 3 points 4 hours ago

I'd argue that even if gen-AI art is indistinguishable from human art, human art is better. E.g. when examining a painting you might be wondering what the artist was thinking of, what was going on in their life at the time, what they were trying to convey, what techniques they used and why. For AI art, the answer is simply it's statistically similar to art the model has been trained on.

But, yeah, stuff like game textures usually aren't that deep (and I don't think they're typically crafted by hand by artists passionate about the texture).

[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 3 points 7 hours ago

I am for the most part angry that people are being put out of work by AI; I actually find AI-generated content interesting sometimes, for example AI Frank Sinatra singing W.A.P. is pretty funny. This label is helpful to me so that I know I'm supporting humans monetarily.

load more comments (23 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›