this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2025
724 points (96.3% liked)

Canada

8766 readers
2349 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


πŸ’΅ Finance, Shopping, Sales


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ShakingMyCane@lemmy.ca 142 points 1 day ago (3 children)

France manages to get a sub to us before the UK even deigns to comment. That says it all. Merci beacoup!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] myersguy@lemmy.simpl.website 115 points 1 day ago (13 children)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] Typotyper@sh.itjust.works 74 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Could have imagined this happening as little as 3 years ago.

An ally sending a nuclear deterrent into our waters as a message/warning to the US. This normally happens to countries like Iran or North Korea

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 13 points 21 hours ago

Still hasn’t happened. This was a sales pitch for a Canadian defence contract.

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 45 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Hey. Guess what? At the moment, we're the bad guys...

[–] XenGi@feddit.org 30 points 1 day ago (2 children)

At the moment? When was there ever a time the US weren't the bad guys?

[–] YtA4QCam2A9j7EfTgHrH@infosec.pub 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Briefly the us was the good guys when we killed a bunch of slavers and then when we killed a bunch of fascists. Those were exceptions to the rule though.

[–] starshipHighwayman69@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Looks at founding fathers... Yeah killed the slavers. Puts blanket over Native Indians. Hides Chinese rail workers under rug. Renames Irish "Indentured workers"

[–] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 9 points 20 hours ago

They also killed the Nazis, except for the ones that were useful, of course.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

To be accurate, this is a nuclear propelled attack submarine. It does not carry nuclear warheads and is not what we normally call a "nuclear deterrent".

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 1 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (4 children)

I believe you, but do you have a source? That's a pretty big distinction when *they're calling it a "nuclear attack submarine"!

EDIT: Clarification

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 41 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Would a french submarine wear its hat like this:

or like this:

[–] gibmiser@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

Asking the real questions

[–] WrenFeathers@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago

Holy shit I laughed out loud…

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 48 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Let's go! France is here to protect Canada!

[–] Typotyper@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 day ago

Na, they’re just finishing the 7years war-round 2

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 9 points 23 hours ago

Idk about that. Other commenters have better explanations that aren't sensational.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone 28 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

The scale of these things is always fascinating. They're always much larger than I think they are.

For reference, I think that's a Suffren class, making it just shy of 100m, or a tad longer than a football field for my fellow Americans.

[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 5 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

The previously-mentioned French article says it's a Barracuda, but I don't know if that's a model or a class.

And unsurprisingly, he also decided to offer the Royal Canadian Navy its "premium" model, the Barracuda, rather than the Scorpène.

The Barracuda is (apparently) an export variant of the Suffren and is indeed a little shorter but still over 300 ft long.

[–] qprimed@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 day ago (3 children)

perchance, banana for scale?

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It's a football field, Micheal. How big could it be, a banana?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Ceedoestrees@lemmy.world 11 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Finally. Letting the French keep a little bit of Canada pays off.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Important note: The "Nuclear" in "Nuclear attack submarine" means that it is powered by a nuclear reactor. It does not refer to its armament. An "attack" submarine means it is designed to attack ships and other submarines and these are typically not capable of carrying and launching ICBMs. Nuclear-armed deterrent submarines are called Ballistic Missile Submarines.

[–] perviouslyiner@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

Don't forget all the cruise missiles - it's not just for attacking things at sea.

[–] Hux@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Don’t tease me!

NOBODY backs an American Revolution like the French!

πŸ‡«πŸ‡·πŸ¦…πŸŽ†

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 0ndead@infosec.pub 16 points 1 day ago (3 children)

β€œBring it” - France probably

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] peteyestee@feddit.org 10 points 1 day ago
[–] sik0fewl@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago (3 children)
[–] Evkob@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 day ago

Here's a French article about it. It's not a show of force, it's a naval defense company showing off their submarine in the hopes of being granted a 60 billion dollar contract for 12 submarines that the Canadian government announced last summer.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: β€Ή prev next β€Ί