this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2025
639 points (94.4% liked)

politics

22046 readers
3317 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Former vice presidential nominee Tim Walz criticized Trump for economic chaos while taking personal responsibility for the situation during an MSNBC interview.

"We wouldn't be in this mess if we'd have won the election — and we didn't," Walz told Chris Hayes. He called Trump the "worst possible business executive" and praised the Wall Street Journal's editorial criticizing Trump's tariff war.

Walz emphasized Democrats must offer something better, not just criticize Trump. Recently, he acknowledged a leadership void in the Democratic Party and admitted spending too much time combatting Trump's false claims about immigrants.

(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 190 points 1 week ago (10 children)

“I think Americans have had it,” Walz explained. ”... Look, I own this. We wouldn’t be in this mess if we’d have won the election ― and we didn’t.”

Good to see someone from the campaign acknowledge "getting votes" was the campaign's entire job, and losing the election is the fault of the campaign.

I hope Walz runs in a competitive primary and gets the nomination.

But if they try to just hand a baton off, we're gonna see the same result.

[–] baronvonj@lemmy.world 34 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Primaries are only competitive if the people show up to them.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 74 points 1 week ago (26 children)

Primaries are only competitive if we actually have them

[–] Stern@lemmy.world 51 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I feel like if Biden had stuck with something like, "I'm going to be one term and let some younger folks lead, we need some folks who are going to see the consequences of their actions running the show, not 70 and 80 year olds." and had an actual primary, Harris wouldn't have been the nominee and said nominee would have won. There's a few other things that could have helped, but the short campaign was definitely a huge stumbling block.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (25 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] MisterOwl@lemmy.world 152 points 1 week ago (30 children)

Nope. This is on Biden. It's his fault Harris/Walz were put into an impossible situation.

That senile old fuck was supposed to be a one-term president. If they'd spent 4 years planning for 2024 instead of sitting around with their thumbs up their asses maybe they could have run a winning campaign.

But no, Joe was too proud or stupid or both to stick to that plan. This election was lost the instant he doddered his way on to the debate stage on 6/27/24.

[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 88 points 1 week ago (4 children)

It's on Biden and Garland for not throwing Trump in prison the second his term ended.

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 67 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Exactly, and it's the third time we've been betrayed like this.

Not going after the Bush administration.

Not going after the subprime mortgage architects.

Not going after Trump.

Three times, they've had the easiest of layups for public approval of all time and they've consistently fucked it up.

[–] stroz@infosec.pub 29 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I'd like to add:

Not going after the Confederate states

to this list

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NotLemming@lemm.ee 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's not really a fuck up when they did it deliberately. Their priorities are in the wrong place because it's an oligarchy.

[–] bishbosh@lemm.ee 22 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Seeing liberal's repeatedly stumble in stopping anyone to the right, but having the fangs come out the moment they need to protect themselves from the left really shows that it's not failure, it's refusal.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] PumpkinEscobar@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Amen. 4 years to build a case? January 6th, spend 6-12 months and file charges. What the fuck were they doing for 4 years?

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago

Running out the clock.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TheGiantKorean@lemmy.world 55 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Lots and lots of balls were dropped. Garland didn't get Trump in jail when he could have. Biden didn't stick to only one term. A democratic candidate wasn't really elected when Biden stepped down (for the record, I think that Harris was more than qualified, but a lot of people were upset that she was just "chosen"). Harris didn't try to stand out and be her own candidate - she mostly just stuck with the status quo and never disagreed with Biden. Etc etc etc.

[–] ExistentialKiwi@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Warning bells started going off in my head the moment that the Democrats announced that Harris was going to be the candidate after Biden dropped out, not because I thought she was an unqualified candidate but because there was no time taken to search for other candidates. Maybe it was too close to the election to take the time to go through the rigamarole of all that but I think even a cursory effort to do so would have gone a long way towards making it feel like people's opinions actually mattered. Biden dropping out was huge (at least to me) because it felt like an acknowledgement of the voters who had consistently felt like they were held hostage for their votes because the alternative was a fascist.

It doesn't help either that they went on to repeatedly shoot themselves in the feet while chasing moderate Republican votes, getting other prominent Democrats to chastise certain classes of voters and breeding the same voter apathy that hurt them in 2016, and their refusal to acknowledge that what's happening in Gaza is a genocide that we shouldn't help Israel perpetrate.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Kalon@lemmy.world 38 points 1 week ago (1 children)

A cascade of failures. Beyond Joe not man enough GTFO, the DNC once again anointed a letter instead of letting the public decide. yes, Joe should never have run for a second term. Given that he did, he should have dropped out sooner. Given that he didn't, the DNC should have had an open convention rather than putting their thumbs on the scale in back room deals.

Tim is 100% right that we would not be in this mess if they had won, but when is the DNC going to stop trying to manipulate everything and lie to us about it? They are to blame as much as Repugnacans.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Harris made choices. She could have chosen not to adopt every single one of Bidens policies. What was biden going to do, fire her? If you look back at her presidential run she really struggled to articulate any policies back then too.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (26 replies)
[–] lordkekz@discuss.tchncs.de 103 points 1 week ago (29 children)

Turns out holding back the things that work (like calling fascists "weird") while not breaking with some of Biden's unpopular policies was a terrible idea... who would've thought? At least Walz is honest enough to admit it. I doubt the DNC will let the social democrats like Walz or Bernie take the lead though... establishment dems would rather stand by and praise Reagan while Trump dismantles the constitution.

[–] nfreak@lemmy.world 48 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

The DNC is a right-wing party and frankly benefits from the current fascist oligarchy too. They still get their bribes from corporate lobbyists all the same. VERY few representatives actually lean left and fight for us - hell, even Sanders, Walz, and AOC are centrists at best and routinely fall in line with the establishment.

2024 was no different than 2016. They didn't listen to their voting base whatsoever because they'd rather have a fascist in charge than give any credence at all to leftist policies, even if it costs them an election. Just look at some of the info coming out about Harris's campaign, where campaign workers were instructed to consider anyone asking about Gaza as a lost cause and not bother trying to earn their vote.

The whole party is rotten to the core and needs to be completely dismantled and replaced with an actual far left worker's party. As it stands right now, the DNC is essentially just a controlled opposition party, even if it's not entirely intended to be one.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (28 replies)
[–] WhatThaFudge@lemmy.sdf.org 61 points 1 week ago (3 children)

“We wouldn’t be in this mess if we’d have won the election — and we didn’t,”
(Implies that if they(H&W) would have won we wouldn't be in this mess)

has quite the different sentiment than

"Tim Walz says ‘we wouldn’t be in this mess’ if it wasn’t for him and Harris" (Implies its their fault we are in this mess)

These headlines -_-

Not that I prefer straight bias but we got conservative media calling these people cutting all of everyone's safety nets "heroes" and this is supposed to be liberal media straight misquoting for clicks?

We are in the worst timeline.

[–] knightly@pawb.social 20 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I do blame them, though. They could have ridden the coattails of Biden's withdrawal all the way to victory, but instead Hartis capitulated and palled around on stages with Republicans instead of Walz.

The failure of the Democrat campaign has a lot of causes, but none more so than the failure of leadership.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] GoodOleAmerika@lemmy.world 57 points 1 week ago (10 children)

Not you walz but the Democratic party. Send out 19 billion to Israel while our kids were hungry in school.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] jpreston2005@lemmy.world 55 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There's no leadership void in the Democratic Party, it's been Bernard Sanders for quite a while. Them denying this is to their (and everyone elses) detriment. Just run Bernie/AOC and let's get this over with.

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Nancy Pelosi is the leadership of the Democrats. And AOC was not allowed to become top house dem. They chose Gerry ~~Atrick~~ Connely instead.

AOC and Bernie will never be allowed to do anything besides sheepdogging progressives into the Democratic party. And at this point it appears they are fully on board with that.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 47 points 1 week ago (4 children)

DNCs fault for blocking Bernie

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] oakey66@lemmy.world 41 points 1 week ago (10 children)

Meanwhile Democrats are lining up Rham Emanuel and Gavin Newsom to run. Lol

[–] mysticpickle@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Dear fucking God not Newsom. That dude is a bigger turd than Hillary.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] RabbitBBQ@lemmy.world 40 points 1 week ago (16 children)

It's so obvious the democratic party lied about Biden to get through the nomination phase and used the fact that the money already donated for the campaign was specifically to Biden or Harris and would not have easily been given over to any other new candidate. You do have to wonder, especially after how Trump was greeted by them, just what actually happened here. The fact is that the truth about Bidens condition should have been known, he should have decided not to run, and the Democratic party should've had a real primary for real candidates and new ideas. Tim Walz was as bad of a VP pick as Tim Kaine. The white guy as VP to shore up the right wing vote is a total myth. Biden was kind of the first one, then Tim Kaine, then Tim Walz. It just doesn't work. Neither will Newsoms podcast attempt at finding common ground which he hopes will translate into moderate votes. Democrats really have no clue just how bad things are about to get...

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 38 points 1 week ago (4 children)

It wasn’t really Tim’s fault. I will never understand why Kamala decided it was more important to try to court Republicans than get Democrats excited. Democrats, and I know this will be a big surprise to Democratic leadership, don’t want to vote for conservatives.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 35 points 1 week ago (36 children)

The voters deserve a lot of blame here.

You can lead a horse to water....

Any ADULT can easily see that politicians are going to be imperfect, and no single candidate is going to align 100% with your stance. Demanding that they do, or else you'll vote for literally the worst possible option, or sit out, or vote a "protest" vote, all so that someone, somewhere will "learn" something is just fucking childish and stupid. And this will be continue to be true no matter how many times the Tone Police show up to admonish people about blaming voters. Sorry, not sorry: I blame the voters.

[–] LeninsOvaries@lemmy.cafe -4 points 1 week ago

You're being mean to me! I hate you mean liberals! You're always picking on leftists who just want to let fascists become president

[–] Kayday@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I agree, I'm also happy that people like Walz seem to want to give people a better option, making a protest vote even less appealing.

load more comments (34 replies)
[–] melpomenesclevage@lemmy.dbzer0.com 32 points 1 week ago (3 children)

honestly, if walz had been managed competently, I think he'd have been a pretty good folksy VP candidate. especially if he'd kept up on the 'weeeeird' stuff.

harris was just a terrible idea, and she didn't even push her strengths. it's like she, and the people who put her there, were all trying to lose.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] maplebar@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (9 children)

I don't blame Harris or Walz. I don't even blame Biden, the senile old fool that he so clearly is.

I blame the Americans for fucking up the most outrageously obvious binary choice in history.

Has there ever been an election so obvious? Even during Trump vs Clinton one could almost be forgiven for giving Trump the benefit of the doubt as a "political outsider", but by 2024 we knew exactly who this fucking guy was... The fact that people today are acting surprised and outraged about all the stuff that's been happening during Trump's first 1.5 months is only further proof that Americans are perhaps the dumbest amnesiacs to infest the Earth.

Literally all we had to do was vote against Trump's particular brand of fascism.

But Americans are the type of people who fail a single question true or false quiz because they forgot to write their name at the top of the page, and we deserve to suffer the consequences of our collective stupidity over and over until it is bred out of us, or until our society falls. The American people allowed this to happen--and not just Trump, but everything bad that has happened over the course of American history.

[–] LeninsOvaries@lemmy.cafe -1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

How dare you!? America is a DEMOCRACY, and that means we can't be blamed for how we vote. If I vote for Trump, I'm not at fault for what happens. In fact, it's Harris's fault. She should have pandered to me more. I can blame her, and only one person can be at fault for something, so I'm guilt free.

You liberals are always trying to guilt trip us leftists for letting fascists take over the government!

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Furbag@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago (19 children)

Instead of frittering away the last few months of his presidential term, Biden should have just resigned and allowed Harris to take over his role. She could have pivoted way to the left without having to undermine Biden's agenda and that would have really sent a clearer message to the democratic base.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 32 points 1 week ago

She could have pivoted way to the left

But she wouldn't have.

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago

Fucking finally. A Democrat we we can respect, because they don't rely on their role inthe damage.

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 1 week ago (2 children)

i want walz and aoc in 2028

we don't blame you tim we love you ❤️

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Sixtyforce@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 week ago

I blame the DNC and Harris far more than him, he was a relatively minor politician recruited by them pretty late in the game. Everyone was worried he'd be too boring, but despite the background character designation, he still came across better than Harris.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›