this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2025
947 points (91.4% liked)

Technology

68434 readers
4270 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I feel like they're reading too much into this.

[–] tupalos@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What is this article even talking about? It’s making no sense.

[–] kava@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

They're trying to make some type of argument that a private studio should have exclusive rights to a specific style of art and that by openai allowing users to generate art in that style, we are slipping into anti-democratic authoritarianism.

My opinion is that you can't own "styles" of art and that there's nothing wrong here. Legally speaking I can copy any art style I want.

[–] VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Yeah they want corporations to own styles so the rich can be more powerful, the rich push this sort of propaganda out endlessly

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] baatliwala@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Title made by the least pretentious American liberal

[–] termaxima@jlai.lu 6 points 1 week ago

An insult to life itself.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Is it really a 'move to allow' style prompts? They're just no longer preventing people from doing that.

It's weird that people who profess to be staunch defenders of art don't understand that stealing styles is fundamental to art. If enough people steal a specific style then art history just labels it a 'movement'. Look on this page: https://magazine.artland.com/art-movements-and-styles/ and you can see that the thing they're describing is a lot of people copying the same style.

Drum and Bass, a music genre, was essentially built on a """""stolen"""" clip from The Winstons in a song called Amen, Brother. The Amen break (you've certainly heard it even if you don't know the name) is copied over and over and over.

This is just the latest social media trend trying to shoehorn issues into the 'AI-bad' meme. Stealing styles is not unusual or even immoral. It is literally the foundation of art.

This is just outrage farming, because 1. People are familiar with this style and 2. The primary artist who made the style popular is against AI.

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Nah information should be free. Ghibli doesn't own its style. Fuck this copyright propaganda machine.

[–] rdri@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I think it is also a kind of "you did a nice thing there, so I'll act as if I can do the same" display.

[–] vane@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Is this fashion comeback ? Style transfer was popular 10 years ago.

load more comments