Don't you worry! Its just that they're busy suing a grandma and a three year old. Once both are properly in jail for saying "it's me Mario" in public, they'll be back making their oh so great video games. Give them more money so they can start more lawsuits.
this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2025
102 points (84.5% liked)
Games
18362 readers
529 users here now
Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)
Posts.
- News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
- Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
- No humor/memes etc..
- No affiliate links
- No advertising.
- No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
- No self promotion.
- No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
- No politics.
Comments.
- No personal attacks.
- Obey instance rules.
- No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
- Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.
My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.
Other communities:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Why didn't you get a Steam deck if you wanted one? I don't see how it's related to Switch 2. Those play different games.
Your comment should not have elicited as much laughter as it did.
Those play different games
Not true. The deck can emulate Switch games. 😌
load more comments
(19 replies)
Exclusives are cancer. Computers should be able to compute everything. Nintendo's/console strategy is an absolute travesty for human progress, like almost all capitalist strategy.
How much e-waste is generated due to equipment that could be redundant if not for exclusives. Not just the consoles either, but all the accessories.
My understanding is that the console hardware itself isn't even that profitable, in the same way that lower-end printers are just platforms to sell ink.
Razors and blades - every console game has a, IIRC, ~$5 platform holder fee, which goes to Microsoft/Sony/Nintendo. So if you buy a Playstation at-cost and then buy 5 games, then Sony makes ~$25 in profit.
load more comments
(1 replies)
I mean, yeah, but at the same time, a Nintendo game being a Nintendo exclusive product doesn’t seem that weird to me. If it was an external studio, sure. But it’s the same company. I agree that it’s annoying, but I don’t think it’s an unreasonable tactic if you control the vertical and you actually DO build good hardware and software that play well together, and you want to leverage the multiplicative effect there.
Sure, I'm not unreasonable. I hate against exclusives, because I'm sure it'd be better without them, but Nintendo is not entirely terrible. It's never completely black & white.
I guess my point is that I think of the Nintendo dynamic more charitably than I think of independent large game studios making platform exclusive titles just because some business deal was struck, simply because the latter creates the impression of vertical integration when there is in fact none.
Nintendo's hardware used to have features that competitors lacked. The DS's dual screens, the 3DS's 3D top screen, the Wiimote, the Wii U's controller with a second screen. Even the Virtual Boy did something different, though it didn't do it well. Nintendo used to innovate on hardware while everyone else was just going for bigger numbers. Exclusives made sense as they made use of those features that you just couldn't get elsewhere.
The Switch and Switch 2 have this portable/dock gimmick but that doesn't really affect gameplay in a way that makes the software incompatible with a PC or a Playstation 4/5. And there's the Steam Deck and a load of other portable gaming PCs out now, so even if it did there'd be no justification for a Switch exclusive other than greed and an unwillingness to prioritize the consumer.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(6 replies)
load more comments
(15 replies)
Yeah, 45% tariffs on Japan and 32% on Taiwan is going to make pricing brutal in the US. I wouldn’t be surprised if $450 and $80 for Mario Cart effectively goes up.
Was there anything about the SoC it uses? What architecture is it?
load more comments
(6 replies)
Steamdeck is better in every way anyway.
Well, except the games that'll only work on Switch and not Steam Deck.
What about the thousands of games that work on Steam Deck and not on a Switch 2?
load more comments
(2 replies)
Eh, Nintendo copyright striking switch emulators right before this release makes me wonder if Switch 2 games can be emulated in the same fashion. If so, then that leaves mainly online multiplayer games that can't be played, and online switch games are not a great experience.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Except it's not. If you actually take a second to look at the specs of the hardware here it's not quite as simple as it might seem at first glance.
I'm comparing the OLED model here since it's most comparable to the Switch 2.
- HDR - tie both support this
- VRR - Deck only supports this with an external display - win Switch 2
- Resolution - 800p vs 1080p max, not even close Switch 2 is a big upgrade here - win Switch 2, not to mention 4K while docked. Good luck getting anywhere near that in even a somewhat recent game on Deck
- Max framerate - 90 FPS max vs 120 FPS max - win Switch 2
- Specs - hard to say but seems like overall Switch 2 is more powerful
- Storage - hard to say exactly but while it seems like on paper Switch 2 should be better here, the actual capacity is way bigger, and Valve has some done some amazing work here to make even games running off an SD card very fast
- Battery - basically the same - tie
- Price - Switch 2 is cheaper at least here in Canada. The 512 OLED model is $689. Switch 2 is $630.
I think it's entirely likely that Switch 2 will perform much better with ports of modern games, where the Steam Deck is starting to show its age and really struggling here.
I love my Steam Deck and it's fantastic for playing smaller budget indie games, older games, emulated games, and tackling my backlog. But any AAA game that's come out say in the last year or two? Forget it. It's just not a good experience. Even BG3 which is Verified was just fine. I played it a lot on my Deck but would it perform better on Switch 2? Probably yes.
It'll definitely be interesting to see how performance of third party titles shakes out between the two.
load more comments
(5 replies)
It was the fact that they didn't show a new UI or added features to the base console. It's effectively only a Nintendo game player and nothing else where as previous consoles were also note taking apps and a calendar and you could doodle animations or even take photos on some of the DSs.
They added no other functionality to this console and left it with less than previous ones. It only plays the games and that's it.
At least a steam deck you can use a browser and watch videos on it too if you really wanted. The only reason to buy the switch is the games now which makes the price per game astronomical effectively.
Hey, that's not completely fair. They added a C-button that activates GameChat, so you can take up space on an already small screen to watch your friends stream their face or their game at 9 frames per second. Oh and also a microphone. Revolutionary stuff, really
Don't forget the mouse feature in the joycons!
Honestly, I’ll still get a Switch 2 for the first party games, but there’s no way in hell I’ll buy a third party game for it if I can add the game to my Steam library. Steam Deck + living room “console” PC is pretty perfect if you know what you’re doing.
You are gonna spend over $700 for a few first party games?
I'm just asking cause that's the cost, $500 console plus extra controller plus the games quickly blooms into nearly a $1000 purchase for a few games.
I just can't justify spending $250 per game I would play on it currently.
load more comments
(3 replies)
view more: next ›