this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2025
1307 points (96.8% liked)

Technology

68434 readers
4740 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 21 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

youtube has enshittified for a while, they went downhill as soon as they announced that they no longer backed election denial reports. then all the right wing, anti-woke videos started popping up all over the place, plus the one that try to seem like its both sides videos too.

allowing people like beast, and others to dominate the front, was asking for trouble.

[–] MasterReflection1916@lemm.ee 8 points 3 days ago

Look at the latest executive order on "protecting children". They are planning for eugenics.

[–] MoonlightFox@lemmy.world 37 points 4 days ago (2 children)

There is one thing that is vital that is missing from peertube. Effective monetization.

By watching on peertube I am a drain on resources. A net negative. I'd happily pay to offset those costs and more, but I want it to be shared amongst multiple creators and hosters.

I don't want to just support one, I want to support most of the network for the hosting and bandwidth, and a certain amount divided amongst the creators I watch.

If PeerTube introduces some sort of payment / monetization solution, it might get more creators as well. Without it I can't see it growing fast enough to compete with YouTube in the near future.

Well.. Sooner or later the costs of Full HD compressed video will be negligible for hosting and bandwidth, so that might be when YouTube gets a real challenge. So I guess we'll see

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (10 children)

I remember the pre-Youtube internet where we created content because it was fun or educational, not because we needed money for the task of doing so.

Paying for server costs and maintaining them, sure. MetaFilter has a good system for that, they're effectively a non-profit and have a donation structure and paid admins and moderators. The rest of the people on the site, they just make good content for the sake of making good content, not because they feel the need to be paid for their time doing it.

God I miss the pre-Youtube era. "Content creators" looking for a payday via advertising are a fucking cancer.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WrenFeathers@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago

They don’t want proof that what’s going to be happening soon, was ever mortally objectionable.

[–] AFC1886VCC@reddthat.com 26 points 4 days ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)

Google should get destroyed

[–] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 12 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Why even bother with a hate speech policy? Oh, right, money.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›