this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2023
1357 points (95.5% liked)

Technology

59577 readers
4760 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Makeshift@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Every single one of these Brave "scandals" are so irrelevant and meaningless. I was hoping the reddit hive mind wouldn't be brought over to lemmy, but here we are.

This article, especially after the update from Brave, seems like a huge nothing-burger. Just another excuse for the Firefox Fanatics crowd to rag on Brave and circlejerk each other about how good Firefox is.

The article isn't even about Brave Browser, and it has nothing to do with user data. The website owner is mad that Brave Search is crawling their site and using data in their "Summarizer" feature. I thought Firefox users were supposed to be against the Google internet monopoly, but apparently when it comes to one of the only companies with their own independent and actually decent search engine, they don't seem to care anymore because of stupid "Firefox good brave bad" browser wars nonsense.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] pozbo@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (24 children)

Been using brave for a few years on mobile and desktop.

They uses to give away BAT, but they have refined their system to not give any unless you spend hours jumping through hoops and linking shoddy Chinese financial apps and crypto wallets.

I still use it for the privacy, but after reading this I will likely switch back to firefox or another chrome based browser.

load more comments (24 replies)
[–] MagnusRobotFighter@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I tried Brave for a couple days but I kept getting notifications from it that were ads. Brave had to go.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] WhoRoger@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's pretty dumb. Brave is looking for any and every monetisation opportunity. Can't blame them, with competition having free browsers, but it doesn't exactly make them trustworthy.

Someone please make a fork of Brave without the nonsense?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Smacks@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Did nobody read the article? The author is crying that Brave implemented a summary feature so users don't have to read through entire paragraphs to get to the actual content. Of course, he goes on and on about copyright and OpenAI, nothing really about user data.

[–] NausetJF@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I never liked Brave. I don't care for the crypto crap they add onto their browser

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Grant_M@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 year ago

Firefox forever.

[–] havokdj@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

I never really liked brave to begin with, I feel safer implementing my privacy myself, and I think gecko just can do it better.

[–] life_is_coffee@lemmy.fmhy.ml 14 points 1 year ago (5 children)

So few browsers left that support privacy

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Desistance@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Damn. Who knew that Brendan Eich was a shady pos.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›