this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2025
553 points (99.6% liked)

196

3044 readers
1765 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
 
all 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 81 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] D_C@lemm.ee 21 points 3 days ago

Exactly. They don't think they'll work means they couldn't even be bothered to attempt it.

This is the problem with kids today, no gumption. Back in my day when I was told to push an onion up my rectum to fight against shingles then, gorramitt, that onion was up there without a moment's thought.
And let me tell you I've never had shingles. Plus, only a few hours later, we then had a tasty onion for our mud stew!!

[–] grue@lemmy.world 47 points 4 days ago (2 children)

That seems expensive for regular mushrooms.

[–] egrets@lemmy.world 78 points 4 days ago

These are sanitary mushrooms.

[–] xorollo@leminal.space 15 points 3 days ago

Pretty good price for tampons. Bet that's why they're unavailable.

[–] TwoBeeSan@lemmy.world 28 points 3 days ago

Load bearing mushroom

[–] ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Have you tried, or are you a coward?

[–] Irelephant@lemm.ee 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I'm a guy, so I don't think I could try if I wanted to.

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago

I guess you'd have to really want to.

[–] BadJojo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 3 days ago

Was their shopper Princess Peach?

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 16 points 3 days ago

Why hate on the natural options?

[–] Emperor@reddthat.com 16 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Maybe this is a software bug? The prices are the same, or it could just be a coincident.

[–] match@pawb.social 38 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I'm fairly convinced it's a shitty image similarity algorithm based off the color and whiteness of a typical tampon

[–] Emperor@reddthat.com 30 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I doubt you would use a image algorithm for this. There is so much better data to cross correlate, not to mention cheaper 😂.

Then again, it's not working so can't expect them to design it well.

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Walmart asked the question "If we can't have replicators from star trek, what if we built a global supply chain fueled by human misery that spreads broken window syndrome like project Pluto spreads radiation instead."

That's company is not going to make human friendly decisions, they're going to make profit obsessed psychopath friendly decisions.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

What else could it be? One person bought both once? That's also a shitty algorithm.

[–] Emperor@reddthat.com 2 points 3 days ago

simplest answer is an database array misalignment, it matched items with the same price instead of another similar attribute.

ML for commonly bought stuff is way overkill for a single query and would eat up infra costs.

[–] sqw@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 3 days ago

"you were already in for 4.67, so we're taking it"