this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2025
1588 points (98.8% liked)

People Twitter

6851 readers
2305 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 5) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 1 day ago

More ineffective Band-Aids.

The core issues never get addressed. Prices keep going up.

And those issues will get worse under a corpo like Trump.

[–] Lucky_777@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

Have 4 kids.

5k is couch money when you have kids. It'll maybe take care of a few months of daycare. Now if you're on gov assistance and make next to nothing? This will be great, but don't expect to get a job or climb out of poverty with 5k. A kid will eat that up super fast.

[–] endeavor@sopuli.xyz -3 points 13 hours ago

Lmao no it doesn't

Americans aren't that stupid

[–] VeryVito@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Are these those welfare babies Republicans always screeeched about?

[–] Barley_Man@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Spending money on families hasn't been shown to help in any way whatsoever in increasing the birth rate. You have countries with close to free day care and generous monthly child subsidies with the same or even much lower fertility rate as countries that give just about nothing at all. I still support these kinds of policies just for the sake of helping families and their kids, but doing it for the only purpose of helping the fertility rate is futile. Honestly I don't think the government can do much at all to help the fertility rate. It's a cultural issue first and foremost. And the government can't (and I think shouldn't!) do much to change the culture of our society. You see people living in poverty with 9 kids just because they belong to a certain religious or ethnic group who values children above all else. That's the main issue. How important is children to the culture? Is it prestigious to be a dad or a mom? Is personal success measured in how you've built your family or is success measured in how much money you make?

[–] SGforce@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

It's a work culture issue. People need free time to socialise meaningfully. Notice how Iceland and France are as high or higher than Colombia?

[–] Barley_Man@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Latin American countries have recently had a collapse in birth rate, even since that chart from 2017 was made. Colombia has dropped to 1,2 in 2023. Fertility rates are collapsing almost everywhere and I think it's because of how globalisation is spreading anti natalist culture around the globe. It's so drastic and so consistent in nearly every developed country.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ZagamTheVile@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

As an atheist baby-eater, sign me up. I could have a lovely dinner party for $5K on Hallowen every year and not have to find a main course.

[–] KelvarIW@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

That's the only way anyone would financially benefit from this bill. Infanticide. And only if they do a home birth.

[–] boonhet@lemm.ee 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I don't think babies are supposed to be profitable.

If you're already gonna have a baby anyway, the 5k is a bonus. Otherwise it won't do much for you.

[–] KelvarIW@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 18 hours ago

Completely. And therefore this is an absolutely terrible way to "boost the U.S. population".

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago

as always, trump's face is in it.

they should have plated the purse in gold to complete the package.

[–] 4am@lemm.ee 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

instead of DEPENDING on GOVERNMENT HANDOUTS new parents should be GRATEFUL someone is WILLING to be GENEROUS and provide them with such GOODWILL. America is WINNING again under PRESIDENT TRUMP

@BigMacHole@lemm.ee am I doing it right?

[–] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

I sometimes joke with my kids and call them Lamborghini 1 and 2, because that's how much money it was suggested you would need for each kid, and I'm sure that has doubled or tripled by now.

[–] sommerset@thelemmy.club 4 points 1 day ago

I mean I like the direction, but this is far cry from other countries.

Give us UHC, improve working rights, guaranteed housing for parents, daycare.

But Its good they at least bringing it up.

[–] pugsnroses77@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago

hospital bill will likely be 10x that

[–] dangling_cat@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

Well, in a couple of years, some countries more than 50% of the population will be retired. Even a perfect democracy would not pass a law to improve young people’s lives so they can have time and money to have kids.

Just like in a perfect democracy, no affordable housing law will be approved because 66% of the population are homeowners.

Its unsolvable.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Archangel1313@lemm.ee 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Considering also, how much they all complained about handing out checks during the pandemic...this just makes no sense. Now they're fine handing out even bigger checks, just to replace the people they're obsessed with deporting?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] scala@lemmy.ml 2 points 23 hours ago

Add an extra zero to that. Then we might consider

[–] als@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 day ago

This is such a classic fascist play, get your bingo cards out ladies

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›