this post was submitted on 10 May 2025
921 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

69910 readers
2251 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gradual@lemmings.world -2 points 32 minutes ago* (last edited 32 minutes ago) (2 children)

A new law could soon allow AI companies to use copyrighted material without permission.

Good. Copyright and patent laws need to die.

All the money wasted enforcing them and taken from customers could be better spent on other things.

Creators will still create, as they always have. We just won't have millionaire scumbags such as 'paul mccartney' living like kings while children starve.

[–] Alteon@lemmy.world 1 points 7 minutes ago

This is a terrible take. Sure. There are issues with the system, but these laws protect smaller musicians and inventors from having their ideas stolen and profited upon by larger players.

Without patent laws, there's no reason to ever "buyout" a design from an inventor, or for smaller songwriters to ever get paid again. A large company or musician could essentially steal your work and make money off of it, and you would get nothing for all of the time and effort that you put into it.

[–] mechoman444@lemmy.world 0 points 22 minutes ago (1 children)

Lol says the guy that's probably going to pirate GTA 6.

And how do you propose people you claim will continue to create be compensated for their work when one of those much bigger corporations you seem to hate simply steal their work and profit off of it?

[–] gradual@lemmings.world 1 points 2 minutes ago* (last edited 41 seconds ago)

Things like rent won't be so expensive because landlords will have less of an excuse to charge customers more money. So, in essence you're not even arguing for compensating creators for their work; you're arguing for compensating their feudal lords.

when one of those much bigger corporations you seem to hate simply steal their work and profit off of it?

Corporations will also make less money because there are no copyright and patent laws. Your cognitive dissonance is on full display here.

This is how we put more money in the hands of the working class, and it's sad watching you fight tooth and nail against it just as you've been conditioned to do.

[–] HighFructoseLowStand@lemm.ee 25 points 15 hours ago (17 children)

What is the actual justification for this? Everyone has to pay for this except for AI companies, so AI can continue to develop into a universally regarded negative?

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] deathbird@mander.xyz 51 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I mean honestly this AI era is the time for these absurd anti-piracy penalties to be enforced. Meta downloads libgen? $250,000 per book plus jail time to the person who's responsible.

Oh but laws aren't for the rich and powerful you see!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] deathbird@mander.xyz 41 points 19 hours ago

Normal people pirate: one hundred bazillion dollars fine for download The Hangover.

One hundred bazillion dollars company pirate: special law to say it okay because poor company no can exist without pirate 😞

[–] arararagi@ani.social 45 points 23 hours ago (10 children)

If AI companies can pirate, so can individuals.

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 52 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

You know I am somewhat of a large language model myself.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 6 points 14 hours ago

At this rate we will get access to more rights if we can figure out a way to legally classify ourselves as AI.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›