Suspect in Natalee Holloway disappearance to reveal details of her death in plea deal, lawyer says (www.nbcnews.com)

submitted 1 year ago by ZeroCool@feddit.ch to c/world@lemmy.world

6 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Joran van der Sloot allegedly struck a deal to plead guilty to involvement in an extortion plot and tell what he knows about the Alabama teenager's disappearance and death in Aruba in 2005.

top 6 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 6 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:

Joran van der Sloot is expected to plead guilty to his involvement in an extortion plot connected to Natalee Holloway's disappearance, and her family's lawyer said the deal will require him to reveal how the Alabama teen died.

“It [the plea agreement] was conditioned upon Mr. van der Sloot revealing details of how Natalee died and how her body was disposed of,” family lawyer John Q. Kelly told NBC News on Sunday.

Holloway, went missing while vacationing in Aruba with classmates celebrating their high school graduation in 2005 and she was declared dead by an Alabama probate court in 2012.

He was extradited to the United States in June to face allegations that he demanded $250,000 from her family in exchange for information about her disappearance.

But it was suddenly rescheduled, which likely means the defendant and government have reached a deal to avoid trial, although it's not clear what charges he'll plead to.

Van der Sloot was already in custody in Peru after being convicted of killing a 2010 a Peruvian college student, Stephany Flores.

The original article contains 251 words, the summary contains 175 words. Saved 30%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] dulcemaria@lemdro.id 6 points 1 year ago

I wouldn’t trust what he will admit as part of the plea deal. He’s been dishonest for years, why would he change now?

[-] Nougat@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

Correct me if I'm wrong here - this doesn't mean he's guilty of her murder, right? Just that he's guilty of involvement in an extortion plot.

Of note, the text of the article says $250,000; the video says $25,000. Video also says that there won't be any further search for her remains. When the reporter asked the attorney why not, his response indicates that there is a specific reason which will become evident in court, and that her mother will speak immediately after the case is finished.

[-] Zippit@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No, he did kill her but the investigation was so mismanaged that it's impossible to prove. Her mother discovered later that the police chief was Joran's godfather and did everything in his power to sabotage the investigation.

She wrote a book about it and it's really disgusting how they treated her and her family. I just listened to a podcast about this case by two sisters that knew her and were in school with her (People are the worst).

Edit: the extortion was an operation by the police and her mother to get him to confess, since he was already asking her for money to tell her where he buried her or how he killed her. (I think)

[-] Nougat@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Oh, I'm sure he did it, but legally speaking, he's still not admitting to the murder, and he's still not been charged with murder. He's pleading guilty to extorting the Holloway family, money for information.

[-] Zippit@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Yes that's what I meant really. He's really a POS torturing that family. I'm really looking forward to read his obituary with pleasure.

this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2023

56 points (96.7% liked)

World News

38977 readers

2054 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.