Asklemmy

48431 readers

987 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago

MODERATORS

206

Why don't communist movements focus on creating and nurturing employee owned businesses? (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by Yondoza@sh.itjust.works to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

186 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The overarching goal of communism is for laborers to own the means of production instead of an owning/capitalist class. Employee owned businesses are the realization of communism within a capitalist society.

It seems to me that most communist organizations in capitalist societies focus on reform through government policies. I have not heard of organizations focusing on making this change by leveraging the capitalist framework. Working to create many employee owned businesses would be a tangible way to achieve this on a small but growing scale. If successful employee owned businesses are formed and accumulate capital they should be able to perpetuate employee ownership through direct acquisition or providing venture capital with employee ownership requirements.

So my main questions are:

Are organizations focusing on this and I just don't know about it?
If not, what obstacles are there that would hinder this approach to increasing the share labor collective ownership?

(page 4) 37 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Because communists wont/can't orginize in numbers that would allow for it.

load more comments (2 replies)

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world -5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (5 children)

If you're vegan you don't decide to eat chicken just because chickens don't eat meat. They're still chickens.

load more comments (5 replies)

load more comments