this post was submitted on 27 May 2025
202 points (97.6% liked)

Science Memes

14700 readers
1214 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mvirts@lemmy.world 23 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Bruh you still gotta publish that unsupported hypothesis

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 18 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Nah, academics love their publication biases.

Wait, I mean journal publishers. Publishers love their publication biases.

Edit: I just remembered it was like 16 years ago I talked about this to a mentor. They wanted a FOSS solution for all those unpublished papers, but nobody ever bothered to put in that effort. A shame, really.

[–] match@pawb.social 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Is there a particular journal for this

[–] mvirts@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Hmmmmm if we can sell it to AI companies....

[–] Midnitte@beehaw.org 17 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Lose interest doesn't seem to have enough connecting arrows

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Other than that, it seems fairly accurate.

[–] xor@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

there are several problems with this flow chart… question life choices, sulk… i’m wondering if this was ai generated

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don't see that as a problem. I can easily get caught in that loop.

[–] xor@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

it bothers me because of my computer science background… flow charts should be pretty much executable, to me… other people can do whatever they want, i suppose.
but, you could have all of the loops with proper arrows and some decisions in there…

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 5 points 2 days ago

Ah, I see. You are thinking about the properly structured flowchart, not the humorously true one.

Yea, fair enough.

[–] K4mpfie@feddit.org 4 points 2 days ago

Idk seems like the whole "write the damn paper and rework it until you're good" part is missing (It's just yet another loop of tantrum and sulk)

[–] Datorie@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

Where’s the inevitable desk reject after months of work?