this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2025
687 points (99.3% liked)

World News

47165 readers
2464 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The New Zealand Parliament has voted to impose record suspensions on three lawmakers who did a Maori haka as a protest. The incident took place last November during a debate on a law on Indigenous rights.

New Zealand's parliament on Thursday agreed to lengthy suspensions for three lawmakers who disrupted the reading of a controversial bill last year by performing a haka, a traditional Maori dance.

Two parliamentarians — Te Pati Maori co-leaders Debbie Ngarewa-Packer and Rawiri Waititi — were suspended for 21 days and one — Hana-Rawhiti Maipi-Clarke, from the same party — for seven days.

Before now, the longest suspension of a parliamentarian in New Zealand was three days.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 4 points 12 hours ago

I don't know anything about New Zealand, or Maori culture, or history, or parliamentary procedure, or the Treaty Principles Bill, or the hearings that led to this decision, or the Haka, or sociology, or anthropology, or race relations, or indigenous issues, but I think...

why don't they just have everyone do their hakas at the start, like in the rugby?

[–] propitiouspanda@lemmy.cafe 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I know one person from New Zealand and she's racist as fuck.

[–] derin@lemmy.beru.co 1 points 23 minutes ago

Cool. Thanks for the contribution to the discussion!

[–] driving_crooner 44 points 1 day ago

Settler colonial government doing what settler colonial governments do.

[–] fritobugger2017@lemmy.world 71 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

It is still a British colony. They need to ditch the British king Charles as fast as possible.

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world -4 points 14 hours ago

Yeah, because that's it...

[–] Justathroughdaway@lemmy.world -5 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (2 children)

As someone who is half-Maori this just embarrasses me. I don't have a problem with people celebrating their heritage and culture just do it in a more appropriate time and place. I wouldn't have a problem with Irish people celebrating the Saint Patrick's Day just as long as they don't do it during a meeting at parliament.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 15 points 13 hours ago (1 children)
[–] joel_feila@lemmy.world 0 points 13 hours ago

Where i want congress to pick up the old tradition of thowimg raw chicken at each other

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world -5 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Unpopular opinion but interruption is interruption no matter the form. I do agree with the native protest here but I wouldn't read into this ruling too much as any governing body would take this position. Weak governing rule set creates these loopholes like the American filibuster which imo is a bug not a feature.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 106 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Tell us you're racist without saying that you're racist.

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago

I dunno. This looks like signing a legal document that confirms they're racist.

[–] FauxPseudo@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago

'If you strike me down, I shall become more powerful than you can possibly imagine.'

[–] zqps@sh.itjust.works 295 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

“Are our voices too loud for this house? Is that the reason why we are being silenced? Are our voices shaking the core foundation of this house? The house we had no voice in building ...We will never be silenced and we will never be lost,” she said.

Fucking powerful.

Despite the signing of the treaty in 1840, there were many bloody conflicts between the colonial government and Maori tribes in ensuing years, resulting in the confiscation of large amounts of Maori land. Tensions remain to this day between New Zealand's Indigenous people and the descendants of the Europeans who colonized their country.

Hey nice, journalism with a backbone!

[–] Karjalan@lemmy.world 45 points 1 day ago (5 children)

It feels so weird, and a little scary, to see people praising brave journalism when they're basically just staying historical facts... It's that not normal journalism? 😅

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 4 points 20 hours ago

Normal journalism requires backbone.

[–] Stamau123@lemmy.world 4 points 21 hours ago

journalism has been weak for years, basically just a bullhorn for whoever is being interviewed in that moment

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Speaking truth when it could get your life ruined or sometimes even taken by the wicked and powerful will always be an act of bravery.

But I agree with you as well. It's terrifying to be surprised when journalists speak the truth, and to see the suppression of truth become "normal" before our very eyes.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] makingStuffForFun@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago

That woman is amazing. What a response.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mcv@lemm.ee 44 points 1 day ago (4 children)

What!? But that haka was awesome! How can you not enjoy that?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] germanichwurst@feddit.org 83 points 2 days ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world 150 points 2 days ago (12 children)

I can probably count a million little “traditions” that parliament follows that are based on Christianity and western colonial culture. But a haka is unacceptable

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Zacryon@feddit.org 59 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Here is a metal version of her really impressive protest. How is this not awesome?

https://youtu.be/JddEXEJ8_S0

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Noerknhar@feddit.org 225 points 2 days ago (67 children)

Well that sounds like some quality racism over there.

load more comments (67 replies)
[–] Stamets@lemmy.world 199 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (8 children)

"a manner that could have the effect of intimidating a member of the house."

Oh go fuck yourself. Can the haka be intimidating as hell? Oh god yes. But you should also be able to recognize the difference between active intimidation and a powerful protest. Especially when YOUR COUNTRY IS KNOWN FOR IT.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] glaber@lemm.ee 82 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And, in 2025, the Pākehā keep deciding what happens to indigenous land and indigenous resources, without letting Maori have any voice in it. Toitū te Tiriti!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CircaV@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Shame. Wtf is wrong with your shitty shitty politics New Zealand?!!?! (Not an American, so I can call out anti-Indigenous politics)

[–] JacksonLamb@lemmy.world 41 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Not an American, so I can call out anti-Indigenous politics

Any decent human being can and should call out anti-Indigenous politics, no matter their nationality.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›