this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2025
701 points (98.9% liked)

Selfhosted

46676 readers
740 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Corporate VPN startup Tailscale secures $230 million CAD Series C on back of “surprising” growth

Pennarun confirmed the company had been approached by potential acquirers, but told BetaKit that the company intends to grow as a private company and work towards an initial public offering (IPO).

“Tailscale intends to remain independent and we are on a likely IPO track, although any IPO is several years out,” Pennarun said. “Meanwhile, we have an extremely efficient business model, rapid revenue acceleration, and a long runway that allows us to become profitable when needed, which means we can weather all kinds of economic storms.”

Keep that in mind as you ponder whether and when to switch to self-hosting Headscale.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PumaStoleMyBluff@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

become profitable when needed

By what, laying off all QA and support staff and half your developers the moment a single quarterly earnings report isn't spotlessly gilded?

[–] bonsai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

I never really understood the point of using Tailscale over plain ol' WireGuard. I mean I guess if youve got a dozen+ nodes but I feel like most laymens topologies won't be complex beyond a regular old wireguard config

[–] Jason2357@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago

NAT punching and proxying when a p2p connection between any 2 nodes cannot be achieved. It’s a world of difference with mobile devices when they always see each other, all the time. However, headscale does all that.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 6 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Wireguard doesn't do NAT/Firewall traversal nor does it have SSO

Tailscale manages the underlying Wireguard for you. I would be great if Wireguard had native NAT traversal but that isn't the case.

[–] jbk@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
[–] bonsai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 hours ago

I mean sure, but I don't think it's simpler than setting up a wireguard config IMO. For tailscale you gotta make an account, register devices, connect them. Feel like wireguard is about the same except you don't have to make an account.

[–] tills13@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago
[–] rarbg@lemmy.zip 16 points 14 hours ago

Nerds stop recommending corporate crap: challenge: impossible

[–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 8 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

And here I am, still using OpenVPN in 2025 lol

[–] phx@lemmy.ca 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Used to run OpenVPN. Tried Wireguard and the performance was much better, although lacking some of the features some might need/want fit credential-based logins etc

[–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, OpenVPN definitely doesn't have light spec requirements 😅 thankfully hardware is unfathomably powerful these days.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 hour ago

Sure but wireguards connection is just faster.

[–] phx@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I didn't really get the allure of it TBH. For most home-based nerds a simple Wireguard host (or OpnSense, OpenWRT etc running such) should be fine, and there are better options for commercial from better-known vendors in the network security space

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 hours ago

The "well known vendors" tend to be crap especially on a security level

[–] FourWaveforms@lemm.ee 0 points 7 hours ago

is this some kind of furry porn CDN

[–] Vinstaal0@feddit.nl 17 points 18 hours ago (12 children)

Crap, I really need to switch of Tailscale but currently it is an easy way for me to access my stuff outside of home as a temporary solution while I am on a 5G modem.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think I'll just keep using tailscale until they start enshittifying, and then set up a Headscale instance on a VPS - no need to take this step ahead of time, right?

I mean, all the people saying they can avoid any issues by doing the above - what's to stop Tailscale dropping support for Headscale in future if they're serious about enshitification? Their Linux & Android clients are open source, but not IOS or Windows so they could easily block access for them.

My point being - I'll worry when there is something substantial to worry about, til then they can know I'm using like 3 devices and a github account to authenticate. MagicDNS and the reliability of the clients is just too good for me to switch over mild funding concerns.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 50 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (8 children)

Join our Discord server for a chat and community support.

Sigh...

And even worse:

Everything in Tailscale is Open Source, except the GUI clients for proprietary OS (Windows and macOS/iOS), and the control server.

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 45 points 1 day ago

everything is open source except half of all things.

Lol

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›