this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2025
375 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

71532 readers
4521 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Buske@lemmy.world 5 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

All your DNA just got bought.

[–] viking@infosec.pub 5 points 6 hours ago

Bought back by the one person who already had prior access, and bought by her own research non-profit. As far as privacy concerns go, that's the best case scenario.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

So glad I never did this one.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 29 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

TTAM later said it had obtained backing from a “Fortune 500 company with a current market capitalization of more than $400 billion and $17 billion of cash on hand.”

That's not at all concerning.

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 15 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (2 children)

A little searching finds only one company that really fits the bill. Costco has a market cap of $433B and had a reported $14.8B cash on hand as of May 11. That's an interesting possibility that I wouldn't have guessed. Costco is less evil than most big corporations, so that's a little hopeful if I got it right.

Oracle comes close with a market cap of $583B. That's indeed over $400B, but that would make the description a bit weird. In any case, Oracle makes more sense from a business angle. Unfortunately, they are near the top of the evil scale.

[–] musubibreakfast@lemm.ee 17 points 9 hours ago (4 children)

Calling it here, Costco is going to use the genetic information to create the perfect hot dog.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

If it costs $1.51 I'm gonna flip shit.

[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 9 hours ago

Costco already creates the perfect hotdog.

I say they should invest in bringing back the Polish dog. That was fucking delicious.

[–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Membership is going to be linked to your DNA, the register will prick your finger to make sure you're valid.

[–] insomniac@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 hours ago

It’s almost certainly Oracle but there’s a slight possibility this is correct

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 0 points 8 hours ago

Soylent dogs

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 10 points 14 hours ago

Shit, Oracle was down in the low $400B range in May. Apparently being evil pays well in the current administration.

[–] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

how the fuck did this company go bankrupt what did i miss

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 11 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

It's not a great business model if you think about it. Customers pay a small fee once then never again.

[–] solarvector@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

When did selling a product instead of a subscription become a bad business model?

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 2 points 6 hours ago

When it's an inexpensive product that nobody ever has a reason to buy twice yet remains an ongoing cost for the company? (They keep the data available for review and continue to update it with useful information as knowledge of genetic traits and lineages grows). That's not a way to build an ongoing cash flow to cover expenses. Especially when all the people inclined to be interested have already purchased.

[–] viking@infosec.pub 1 points 6 hours ago

Selling a product is a good business model if the product has a shelf life or naturally degrades over time, but served you so well that you'll replace it in kind or with an upgrade.

A product that does something exactly once and done doesn't scale long term, so once the hype was over, that was that.

[–] 13igTyme@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

When quarterly profits must always be green compared to the previous quarter.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 218 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Start company.

Run it into the ground.

Go bankrupt.

Buy it back.

📈

[–] MrNesser@lemmy.world 119 points 1 day ago

Debts are gone might as well

[–] driving_crooner 72 points 1 day ago (2 children)

In the capitalist system, the investors deserve all the profits because they're the ones risking everything, or something like this, I'm not an economists.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago

Bondholders are having a haircut.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 40 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (13 children)

Yes, and the workers risk nothing, or something like that, I'm told. 😂

[–] SMillerNL@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

I’m pretty sure the users risked a lot too for this one

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 32 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

You missed 2. Sell (IPO)company

I’m not sure what ~~he~~ she actually did as far as divestiture, but evidently he wasn’t the current owner. I wonder to what degree unreasonable growth expectations flushed the company.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 37 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How about the data they sold

[–] sugarfoot00@lemmy.ca 11 points 13 hours ago

That's exactly where all the value is. Selling people's fucking genetic information. What makes it even more valuable is that it can be used against all subsequent descendants of the person that willingly gave it up. Do a DNA test like this and you're selling out your entire family.

[–] rumba@piefed.zip 60 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Debts are gone AND now he can sell the user data with impunity! No NO, that was that OTHER GUY

[–] WhiteRice@lemmy.ml 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] rumba@piefed.zip 22 points 1 day ago

heh fair, gender bias for me.

[–] 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 3 points 1 day ago

Hey, don't talk about Guy Incognito like that

[–] deathbird@mander.xyz 77 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Actually an interesting turn of events. Sounds like she'd been fighting hard to get it back, but they'd been fighting her on it.

Not sure what it all means, but there's something going on there. It's all very unusual.

[–] zipzoopaboop@lemmynsfw.com 28 points 1 day ago

Selling off user data but has an excuse to "wasn't me" the whole situation

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] witty_username@feddit.nl 23 points 1 day ago

This roller coaster keeps on rollering

[–] drspod@lemmy.ml 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I thought they had already agreed the sale of the genetic data to another company?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 7 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Ok so I think I'm the first person in the comments to actually click to read the article, cause I'm gonna say something I'm not seeing.

How did you get it to auto snap to the article comment section?
Didnt realize you could share that and it wouldn't default to the article.

[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Some webpages have a bad habit of automatically appending tags to the URL, or outright changing it, as you scroll down.

[–] HereIAm@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The "#comment" at the end of the URL. It's a title/heading/fragment in HTML that hints to your browser to go there directly.

Like this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/URL#fragment

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Everything after the # character in the URL is called an anchor and it's not actually being sent to the website server so it's meant for your browser (though the server can see it using javascript). The anchor can point to any ID in the HTML of the web page and browser will scroll it into view on page load. You can find the ID of any element using right click -> inspect though not all elements have explicit ids.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›