this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2025
416 points (97.3% liked)

politics

24755 readers
2411 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Writing on X, the Republican politician said she was creating legislation that would make "the injection, release, or dispersion of chemicals or substances into the atmosphere for the express purpose of altering weather, temperature, climate, or sunlight intensity" a felony.

"I am introducing a bill that prohibits the injection, release, or dispersion of chemicals or substances into the atmosphere for the express purpose of altering weather, temperature, climate, or sunlight intensity," she wrote. "It will be a felony offense."

She added: "We must end the dangerous and deadly practice of weather modification and geoengineering."

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tungsten5@lemmy.zip 12 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

I haven’t read the article or comments yet. Just the post title. I am afraid of the amount of brain cells I am about to lose. I’m going in, will update in a moment.

Edit: what the fuck did I just read. A new bill to stop a conspiracy theory? MTG is dumb as a stone and I can’t comprehend how she is still in office

[–] guyoverthere123@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

MTG is dumb as a stone and I can’t comprehend how she is still in office

Her voters are dumber than she is.

That's how she is still in office.

[–] Kickforce@lemmy.wtf 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Could the bill be used to base measures on that help combat climate change? Sometimes idiots are actually useful.

[–] tungsten5@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Could it? Possibly. Would it? Probably not. At least not with big daddi T/ republicans in office. They deny the effects of pollutants in the atmosphere so there is no weather modification taking place (according to them). Considering that trump is taking away tax credits for solar and wind and is increasing leasing and tax credits for oil, gas, and coal industries I don’t think this bill will provide much benefit for the climate

[–] Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 6 days ago

Next up is a bill to shoot every remaining unicorn

[–] TuffNutzes@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

Go get 'em, Marge. Champion of the dummies.

[–] SpecialSetOfSieves@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Would this... proposed legislation... mean that SpaceX will now be prohibited from flooding LEO with Starlink comsats?

Loading the upper atmosphere with ozone-destroying aluminum and other heavy metals as those things fall out of orbit, not to mention rapidly increasing light and RF pollution, definitely qualify as an uncontrolled geoengineering experiment, albeit one whose effects were known before launch. I could go on about the deleterious effects of these orbiting swarms, but - the ball's in your court, Congresswoman Greene.

[–] Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 6 days ago

They will be happy to ban space exploration actually. Half of them believe there is a firmament there anyway.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

It's like utterly humorless Art Bell fans took over the government.

[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 165 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I am introducing a bill that prohibits the injection, release, or dispersion of chemicals or substances into the atmosphere for the express purpose of altering weather, temperature, climate, or sunlight intensity,”

So carbon dioxide? Guess we better shut down the coal power plants. MTG says so!

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 64 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Alas "express purpose" is in there. Clearly the express purpose for petrol companies is profit. And CO2, other pollutants are just inadvertent things that happened on the way to (destroying the planet for) profit. I mean they only sold the petrol products, they didn't force people that purchased the gasoline to burn it. Maybe we can go after the combustion engine producers?

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

So one could say they hobby at creating potassium iodide, but its expensive to pay to dispose of, so I dump it out of the back of an aircraft that was hired. There was no intention of actually seeding the clouds and making it rain, right?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MadMadBunny@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 week ago

All pollution?!? Make all pollution illegal?!?!?

That’s what it is, right?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Theprogressivist@lemmy.world 118 points 1 week ago (4 children)

What an absolute fucking idiot.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 77 points 1 week ago (4 children)

So would preventing “geoengineering” also prevent trying to stop climate change?

[–] FistingEnthusiast@lemmynsfw.com 42 points 1 week ago

She only knows that word because someone told her today

She's a bloody idiot

[–] tburkhol@lemmy.world 35 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I honestly can't tell whether her intent is to block any counter-climate change projects or if this is just a dumb chemtrails thing.

I mean, I assume it's chemtrails, given the source, but it could easily be a "I like the smell of forest fires, and you'll reduce hurricane intensity over my dead body." Given the source.

[–] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 week ago

THEY will tell you when YOU broke the law. Then "deport" you to a private funded prison in a foreign country.

They embrace the invisible. You have no defense against their claims.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 63 points 1 week ago (2 children)

If this unintentionally regulates greenhouse gas emissions I’m going to laugh so hard.

[–] Chocrates@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

Express purpose probably saves them. The express purpose is to vent externalities

[–] P1k1e@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

It would be beautiful if this dimwit bumbled her way into making the world a better place....but we're probably in the wrong timeline for that

[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 39 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is performative ignorance, to please the home schooled bible toting cretins who vote.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] waterSticksToMyBalls@lemmy.world 34 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Misting fans are now a felony

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Caffeinated_Sloth@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is awesome. Do it. What’s gonna happen when the contrails don’t disappear? Who are they gonna arrest? Gonna have to stock up on popcorn because the theatre of the ignorant is about to get really interesting. Finally a piece of legislation I can get excited about.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 41 points 1 week ago (5 children)

This is a bill to arrest people trying to prevent climate change.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

All the fucking stupidest people. Every goddamn idiotic conspiracy theory is getting a pipeline straight to mainstream news outlets and a rep in government now. Instead of some stupid Bircher literature or having to stand out on the street and screech nonsense at passerby who could just ignore the crazy people...

I am seriously wondering when the moon landing denialists and the flat earth morons and the HIV-denialists will get their day of representation, too.

We already have the anti-vaxxer dumbfucks, the Qanon loons, the evolution-denying dipshits, what else is missing...? How about David Icke level bullshit about lizard people?

JFC.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ieatpwns@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So go after the bullshit corpos releasing megatons of co2 into the atmosphere

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 week ago (6 children)

So, she wants to ban "cloud seeding"?

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] TechAnon@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (2 children)

These aren't serious people.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Octavio@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The only “weather modification machines” are fossil fuel powered energy plants. We should join together with MTG to outlaw them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lipilee@feddit.nl 19 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I'll rotfl my mao off when this law will turn out to accidentally punish fossil fuel and chemical companies dispersing chemicals or substances into the atmosphere and altering weather, also known as climate change.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (2 children)

If I could control the weather, this woman would never not be getting targeted by lightning. She'd have to run serpentine whenever she was outside to dodge all the lightning bolts aimed at her.

[–] NoForwardslashS@sopuli.xyz 17 points 1 week ago

Calm down Zeus. You're getting another unhealthy attraction to a mortal woman.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Thermite@lemmings.world 17 points 1 week ago

Does this make "Rollin' coal" illegal?

[–] arin@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

Why is mtg still able to talk?

[–] MrSulu@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I thought she'd prioritize dealing with sharknado attacks but there we have it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Maybe they'll unintentionally outlaw pollution like when the Republicans accidentally legalized cannabis in 2018

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] d33pblu3g3n3@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Marjorie Taylor Green is such a waste of resources.

Ugly, dumb and vile.

And I bet she stinks.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 16 points 1 week ago

I can see how people in the future could turn this one around on to oil and plastic companies. We should probably not stop this one.

[–] BeNotAfraid@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

She's attempting to ban Geoengineering. From Wikipedia:

Geoengineering (also known as climate engineering or climate intervention) is the deliberate large-scale interventions in the Earth’s climate system intended to counteract human-caused climate change.[1] The term commonly encompasses two broad categories: large-scale carbon dioxide removal (CDR) and solar radiation modification (SRM). CDR involves techniques to remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and is generally considered a form of climate change mitigation. SRM aims to reduce global warming by reflecting a small portion of sunlight (solar radiation) away from Earth and back into space. Although historically grouped together, these approaches differ substantially in mechanisms, timelines, and risk profiles, and are now typically discussed separately.[2]: 168 [3] Some other large-scale engineering proposals—such as interventions to slow the melting of polar and alpine ice—are also sometimes classified as forms of geoengineering.

Some types of geoengineering present political, social and ethical issues. One common objection is that focusing on these technologies could undermine efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Effective governance and international oversight are widely regarded as essential.

Major scientific organizations have examined the potential, risks, and governance needs of geoengineering, including the US National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine,[4][5][6] the Royal Society,[7] the UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO),[8] and the World Climate Research Programme.[1]

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

All this is gonna stop is cloud seeding, since that is literally the only way in which we manipulate the weather.

Well... On purpose, I mean. If this has the side effect of outlawing all greenhouse emissions because it's altering the weather in form of making shit hotter, that's a win.

Edit: Also I am reminded of the time some PR lady for HAARP said the array can manipulate the weather because, technically, it could punch a hole in clouds directly above it. Which I thought was just stupid, even as a joke, because they were trying to squash the rumors that it was some kind of hurricane machine.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] GhostOnTheHalfShell@masto.ai 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

@RememberTheApollo_

OMG I think this is an opening for an absolutely different kind of green new deal. Wait till she finds out how the weather is being modified (can somebody tell her that Elon Musk’s data center is running the numbers and doing it?)

And I’m going to have to ask now that the Republicans are in charge of everything with the next big disaster occurs. What is she gonna do?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DrFistington@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

Stop paying attention to her. Make sure the next thing you click on related to her, is footage of her murder.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

So glad we handed over all levers of power to these morons.

load more comments
view more: next ›