this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2025
416 points (97.3% liked)

politics

24740 readers
2248 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Writing on X, the Republican politician said she was creating legislation that would make "the injection, release, or dispersion of chemicals or substances into the atmosphere for the express purpose of altering weather, temperature, climate, or sunlight intensity" a felony.

"I am introducing a bill that prohibits the injection, release, or dispersion of chemicals or substances into the atmosphere for the express purpose of altering weather, temperature, climate, or sunlight intensity," she wrote. "It will be a felony offense."

She added: "We must end the dangerous and deadly practice of weather modification and geoengineering."

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TechAnon@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (2 children)

These aren't serious people.

[–] MrShankles@reddthat.com 8 points 1 week ago

They're decreasing the food, so they gotta increase the circus

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 week ago

We dont live in a serious nation.

[–] lipilee@feddit.nl 19 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I'll rotfl my mao off when this law will turn out to accidentally punish fossil fuel and chemical companies dispersing chemicals or substances into the atmosphere and altering weather, also known as climate change.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (2 children)

If I could control the weather, this woman would never not be getting targeted by lightning. She'd have to run serpentine whenever she was outside to dodge all the lightning bolts aimed at her.

[–] NoForwardslashS@sopuli.xyz 17 points 1 week ago

Calm down Zeus. You're getting another unhealthy attraction to a mortal woman.

[–] Lucky_777@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Laughs in Final Fantasy X

[–] arin@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

Why is mtg still able to talk?

[–] MrSulu@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I thought she'd prioritize dealing with sharknado attacks but there we have it.

[–] But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Immigrantnado!

The new conservative horror film

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 16 points 1 week ago

I can see how people in the future could turn this one around on to oil and plastic companies. We should probably not stop this one.

[–] BeNotAfraid@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

She's attempting to ban Geoengineering. From Wikipedia:

Geoengineering (also known as climate engineering or climate intervention) is the deliberate large-scale interventions in the Earth’s climate system intended to counteract human-caused climate change.[1] The term commonly encompasses two broad categories: large-scale carbon dioxide removal (CDR) and solar radiation modification (SRM). CDR involves techniques to remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and is generally considered a form of climate change mitigation. SRM aims to reduce global warming by reflecting a small portion of sunlight (solar radiation) away from Earth and back into space. Although historically grouped together, these approaches differ substantially in mechanisms, timelines, and risk profiles, and are now typically discussed separately.[2]: 168 [3] Some other large-scale engineering proposals—such as interventions to slow the melting of polar and alpine ice—are also sometimes classified as forms of geoengineering.

Some types of geoengineering present political, social and ethical issues. One common objection is that focusing on these technologies could undermine efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Effective governance and international oversight are widely regarded as essential.

Major scientific organizations have examined the potential, risks, and governance needs of geoengineering, including the US National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine,[4][5][6] the Royal Society,[7] the UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO),[8] and the World Climate Research Programme.[1]

[–] d33pblu3g3n3@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Marjorie Taylor Green is such a waste of resources.

Ugly, dumb and vile.

And I bet she stinks.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GhostOnTheHalfShell@masto.ai 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

@RememberTheApollo_

OMG I think this is an opening for an absolutely different kind of green new deal. Wait till she finds out how the weather is being modified (can somebody tell her that Elon Musk’s data center is running the numbers and doing it?)

And I’m going to have to ask now that the Republicans are in charge of everything with the next big disaster occurs. What is she gonna do?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DrFistington@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

Stop paying attention to her. Make sure the next thing you click on related to her, is footage of her murder.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

So glad we handed over all levers of power to these morons.

[–] nimble@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 week ago

Does this include using a sharpie to control a hurricane?

[–] whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

wow that's quite a twist, USA is going green! Right?

[–] Bbbbbbbbbbb@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Thats what I'm understanding. Finally someone willing to take on the Fossil Fuel Industry

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pawnfuture@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

These people are dumb as rocks. There are also similar elements in GA like Kandiss Taylor(stupid name) beginning their political careers also proclaiming that Climate Change is fake but also suggesting that unprecedented weather conditions must be the work of external forces presumably also blaming the jews.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

anything but the real issue

[–] Doom@ttrpg.network 6 points 1 week ago

Wonder if this could be used against fossil fuel or chemical companies. The only words that would need to be dropped is "express purpose"

[–] MITM0@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Does it include the pollutants coming from her private jet ?

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

I will fuckin love if she fucks around and discovers climate change

[–] etherphon@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Seriously fuck this idiot and the idiots who voted for her. Just a disgraceful embarrassment. Then again so is work, so I get it, but have some dignity.

[–] MoonRaven@feddit.nl 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

And thus more time and money is wasted...

Wasn't there some doge tip site where Americans could post this?

[–] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago (3 children)

It's because MAGA is spreading conspiracies that geoengineering is to blame for the Texas flood.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

There is a nugget of 'truth' here:

https://csl.noaa.gov/news/2023/390_1107.html

I can't find my good source on tis, but there are very real proposals to seed the arctic or antarctic with aerosols to stem a runaway greenhouse gas effect.

It's horrific. It would basically rain down sulfiric acid onto the terrain; even worse than it sounds. But it would only cost billions, not trillions of other geoengineering schemes I've scene.

...And the worst part is it's arctic/climate researchers proposing this. They intimately know exactly how awful it would be, which shows how desperate they are to even publish such a thing.

But I can totally understand how a layman (maybe vaguley familiar with chemtrail conspiracies) would come across this and be appalled, and how conservative influencers pounce on it cause they can't help themselves.

Thanks to people like MTG, geoengineering efforts will never even be considered. :(


TL;DR Scientists really are proposing truly horrific geoengineering schemes "injecting chemicals into the atmosphere" out of airplanes. But it's because of how desperate they are to head off something apocalyptic, and it's not even close to being implemented. They're just theories and plans.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why the fuck did we thaw her?

[–] smeenz@lemmy.nz 4 points 1 week ago

Nobody wanted that. She thawed naturally with global temperatures rise.

[–] Hadriscus@jlai.lu 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Could MTG accidentally tackle climate change ? that would be amazing

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Unfortunately, this bill would actually do the opposite. While expert opinion seems to vary on the subject of geoengineering and its attendant risks, it might become a necessary tool for tackling climate change. The standard theory is that we could disperse aresolized materials at high altitudes that would increase atmospheric albedo (reflectivity) to reduce the amount of sunlight absorbed by the atmosphere. This wouldn't be permanent, but it could buy us time as we work on decarbonizing.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›