this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2025
358 points (95.4% liked)

Programming

21621 readers
193 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] monkeyman512@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It would be interesting to see another study focusing on cognitive load. Maybe the AI let's you offload some amount of thinking so you reserve that energy for things it's bad at. But I could see how that would potentially be a wash as you need to clearly specify your requirements in the prompt, which is a different cognitive load.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Cyberflunk@lemmy.world 0 points 5 days ago

My velocity has taken an unreasonable rocket trajectory. Deploying internal tooling, agent creation, automation. I have teams/swarms that tackle so many things, and do it well. I understand there are issues, but learning how to use the tools is critical to improving performance, blindly expecting the tools to be sci-fi super coders is unrealistic.

[–] Ek-Hou-Van-Braai@piefed.social -2 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I wish AI was never invented, but surely this isn't ture.

I've been able to solve coding issues that usually took me hours in minutes.

Wish it wasn't so, but it's been my reality

[–] Traister101@lemmy.today 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

LLMs making you code faster means your slow not LLMs fast

[–] Ek-Hou-Van-Braai@piefed.social -2 points 5 days ago (10 children)

I doubt anyone can write complex regex in ~30 seconds, LLM's can

[–] staircase@programming.dev 4 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I'm not trusting a regex written by AI

[–] FizzyOrange@programming.dev 1 points 5 days ago

You don't have to. You can read it.

[–] Ek-Hou-Van-Braai@piefed.social 0 points 5 days ago (3 children)

That's why you write tests

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

You have definitely never worked with a regex guru.

[–] Ek-Hou-Van-Braai@piefed.social 2 points 5 days ago (2 children)

No, but not everyone is a regex guru.

If AI can write code half as good and fast as a regex guru, it's going to increase the average dev's productivity a lot

[–] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 5 days ago

does the regex search for what you wanted to? Does it work in all cases? Can I be confident that it will find all instances i care about, or will I still have to comb the code manually?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TehPers@beehaw.org 0 points 5 days ago

Depends on what you need to match. Regex is just another programming language. It's more declarative than traditional languages though (it's basically pattern matching).

Pattern matching is something I already do a lot of in my code, so regexes aren't that much different.

Regardless, the syntax sucks. It takes some time to get familiar with it, but once you get past that, it's really simple.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] davidagain@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

The experienced developers in the study believed they were 20% faster. There's a chance you also measured your efficiency more subjectively than you think you did.

I suspect that unless you were considerably more rigorous in testing your efficiency than they were, you might just be in a time flies when you're having fun kind of situation.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›