this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2023
183 points (75.1% liked)

Memes

45637 readers
1185 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FluffyPotato@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If the options are Stalin or capitalism, then capitalism would be a clear winner even if it's shit because Stalin and his ideology still has the 2 issues from the first panel but on top of that he would execute anyone with an actual good system.

[–] hairinmybellybutt@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Stalin and communism are different things

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If we change anything, Stalin will personally come and steal your toothbrush.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] negativeyoda@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Not a fan of capitalism, but enough with the tankie garbage

[–] VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf 10 points 1 year ago

You can be against reflexive non-sequitor defenses of capitalism without being a tankie. The last panel could have been "no, because the free market always corrects itself" and the meaning would have been the same.

[–] hairinmybellybutt@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

I'm not pro-russia

[–] Zyansheep@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

This is pretty standard left wing stuff, tankie garbage would be like: "we need to create a dictatorship of the proletariat to prevent climate change"

Edit: well maybe it might be a little bit tankie from the last bit

[–] irmoz@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago

No, that's still just being leftist. Tankie shit is "kill all who disagree with the revolution".

[–] EchoCT@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do you even know what Tankie means, or do you just like throwing around useless labels?

[–] MindSkipperBro12@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Ah yes, I remember the USSR being known for being very environmentally friendly

[–] NutWrench@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago

"Communism" does not describe any nation on Earth today, no matter what they choose to call themselves.

Most of the "communist" (and "capitalist") nations in the world are run by a small number of greedy, brutal assholes who have concentrated their entire nation's wealth into an elite 1%. NONE of them believe in anything beyond money.

[–] Miczech@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (5 children)

This is naive. Having grown up in a post communist country I know better than to fall for empty propaganda. You don't know what you're asking for calling out on communism as your saving grace. Communism didn't allow for any valie creation and the system was too rigid to respond to people's needs as economy was preplanned in 5 year intervals. Chronic shortages. Full employment was required by law but quality of life remained stagnant. Capitalism has its pitfalls too. The best outcome lays somewhere in the middle of the two

[–] hairinmybellybutt@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I'm not advocating for communism, and a political crisis of an authoritarian/totalitarian regime is a different problem from communism. Capitalism has a lot of problems, and I agree that there should be a better in-between to mitigate inequalities. Socialism is soluble in capitalism.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] voidMainVoid@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (7 children)

How many people has capitalism killed?

[–] zakobjoa@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Millions, easily.

British East India Company, one of the first publicly traded entities, commited a couple of genocides before Marx even shit his first nappie. So capitalism got a nice head start in.

[–] VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf 5 points 1 year ago

Including social murder? Several billions.

[–] EchoCT@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago
[–] VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf 1 points 1 year ago
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›