this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2023
205 points (99.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5282 readers
511 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Hyperreality@kbin.social 50 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable."

― John F. Kennedy

Remarks on the first anniversary of the Alliance for Progress, 13 March 1962

[–] andymouse@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 year ago

In 1962 there were no "lethal autonomous weapons".

[–] Damage@slrpnk.net 36 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We all know what happens when you're not even allowed to protest for your grievances

[–] andymouse@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 year ago

Yes, slavery. It's been around for ages.

[–] NightAuthor@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Maybe I’m misunderstanding what protests are, but it seems to me that if you don’t have the right to disruptively protest then you don’t have the right to protest.

[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I guess it depends on the level of disruption. Standing in the street is a little different from dismantling a bridge for example.

[–] NightAuthor@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But if you can dismantle a bridge without hurting anyone, and do so in protest of something, that’d be impressive and should be allowed.

[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I agree it'd be impressive. But is making thousands of people drive more hours every day due to increased congestion hurting them? In the US, most people wouldn't have another option than to just sit in traffic much longer.

[–] NightAuthor@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I think making people rethink what they "don't have another option" for would be a great reason to disruptively protest something. Like in protest of cars, a bunch of people block the roads only allowing public transit through. Do that long enough, maybe you can people to realize nearly all shortcomings of public transit are caused by underfunding, which is caused by all the money going to car infrastructure.

But of course looking at that from a different perspective would fucking suck, if you're a single parent, working 3 low-wage jobs, and you just want to get to work so you can afford to feed your child next week.... and then some idiots are impeding you getting to work.

But on the other other hand, maybe if the idiots were successful, you'd be able to get to work without owning a car, and you'd be able to work less, not having to pay for a car, gas, insurance, and maintenance. Ultimately improving your life... but only if they're successful. And in the meantime...

/shrug

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You have the right to shout into the void.

[–] andymouse@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Only if other people can't hear you or you'll be a disturber of the peace.

[–] FMT99@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There was a farmers protest here during Covid, protesting environmental laws. They took their tractors onto the highways en-masse, super dangerous. They camped out outside a politician's house at night to threaten them. Burned things etc etc. Thousands of farmers involved, police didn't do anything for weeks. No arrests, no consequences.

[–] Scribbd@feddit.nl 13 points 1 year ago

There were arrests. And as far as I know, extinction rebellion right now are treated the same. I am unaware of any sentencing though.

[–] pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe 26 points 1 year ago

Fascism pretty much. It's what any capitalist economy resorts to when it's about to collapse.

This is only the beginning. Eventually they'll resort to returning to slavery, or quasi-slavery to keep the economy going and then... collapse.

It's unironically proof of how deeply climate collapse is affecting humanity. The fact that they're openly honest about the fact that this is meant to intimidate people into not protesting is all you need to know.

[–] spudwart@spudwart.com 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The amount of obnoxious "But they're holding up traffic!" "But they're inconveniencing me!" as reasons for why they're against these protests makes it clear to me how much of humanity is a lost cause.

How did we go from disruptive protests bringing about civil rights and a better standard of living for people in the modern era, to this?

Plot twist: We didn't. It's just not a protest in favor of fascist beliefs.

The trucker protest didn't get nuked by the same fucks who argue "but muh traffic" logic everytime Just Stop Oil shows up.

Just Stop Oil causing minor disruptions in traffic = evil bad and "i have to get to work."

Fascist Truckers literally causing gridlock and constant noise disturbances for days on end = "BASED BASED BASED, LGB! WOOOOOOOOOOO"

Yeah, sure. Disruptive protests are only okay when they threaten to overturn an election or furthering some other fascist goal. But keeping us all from frying? "I HAVE TO GET TO WORK!!"

Uh huh. Nah, if someone disrupts traffic and makes me late to work. I'm taking video, and keeping that for my excuse to being late to work.

If you're having an issue with being late to work, because you will lack hours, maybe you and a group of your fellow workers might get an idea from this little incident. Where you maybe could, hmm i dunno, form a disruptive group that goes on strike and negotiates for better wages and terms of employment.

[–] Adori@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago
[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

For climbing.