23
submitted 1 year ago by Phoephus@lemmy.world to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml
top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] MothBookkeeper@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Here's a chart that I've found really helpful. Predictably, it's drawn some criticism, but in my experience, it's been very accurate.

[-] EnjoiNakMuay@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Except they daily mail is well known as a heavily right leaning paper for years. So I wouldn't take that images accuracy to heart

[-] FrankTheHealer@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

NPR

PBS

AP

Reuters

BBC

The Guardian

[-] outstanding_bond@mander.xyz 5 points 1 year ago

DW news (dw.com) is pretty good and not too sensational. They’re like German PBS with a whole English side of the site.

[-] thusband@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Thanks for dw.com. It looks like a keeper.

[-] chaorace@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 1 year ago

The Economist. Despite the insufferable name, it's really quite good. It's one of the only traditional publications that I actively pay for and read weekly.

[-] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 2 points 1 year ago

Same here. Outside of if their Fuck Russia coverage (which isn't unearned) or the viewpoint of a noble wanting to actually understand what is going on with the masses, it is pretty good.

[-] MusketeerX@aussie.zone 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah, agreed, it's pretty good.

[-] shua_too@midwest.social 3 points 1 year ago

I get a weekly email from Ground.News and it’s been pretty interesting to see the distribution of sources covering various stories. I’ve never personally mused on the leanings of various sources but it passes the eye test I think, and it helps give a good aggregation of perspectives on a story.

[-] pinwurm@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

https://ground.news/ is a pretty good resource. It’s a news aggregate that also reveals the source’s/writer’s political biases as a percentage of left or right. Also it’s factuality versus editorialization, and who owns the outlet.

Definitely one of the better ones out there.

[-] pumpkin@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

I don't really read news in English anymore, but when I did, I subscribed to the economist. I found most other news sites were too biased and ignored most of the world.

[-] elltee@lemmy.one 2 points 1 year ago

Ground.news They label bias both left, right, ans center. Blindspots, which are things that are only bring shown to one side of the political spectrum. Not sure how effective they are outside the US, tho.

[-] hendrik@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

heise online

[-] richneptune@lemmy.fmhy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

BBC News. They do a fairly good job of being impartial since both main party voters here in the UK hate it and accuse it of being biased to the opposition!

[-] Kettlepants@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

Isn't it populated in the highest echelons by Tories who ensure the government is given an easy ride?

[-] lazynooblet@lazysoci.al -4 points 1 year ago

No it's full of labour lovers!

[-] HollywoodFlowers@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

What country do you live in?

[-] stochasticity@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

NYT. But of course, as with any source, remain critical and check for retractions/corrections.

[-] fubo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I'm fortunate to live in an area with good local independent news sources like Berkeleyside.

National & international are a big mess. Better to look at lots of different sources. If the Wall Street Journal, Al-Jazeera, and The Grauniad all talk about an event, it probably happened.

[-] Atarian@vlemmy.net 1 points 1 year ago

I don't.

I don't need fear porn in my life.

[-] Lightmeter@lemmy.fmhy.ml 1 points 1 year ago
[-] AceLucario@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

If something's important enough, I end up hearing it through people on discord. I don't actively look for news.

[-] itchy_lizard@feddit.it -2 points 1 year ago
[-] heartlessevil@lemmy.one 7 points 1 year ago

lmao half the page is grayzone and RT. the only good thing about that place is knowing who to block tbh.

[-] itchy_lizard@feddit.it 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Never heard of greyzone, but what you say is not true. Sorting by "Top" shows The Guardian, Reuters, Aljazeera, etc. The coverage is spread between many sources.

[-] heartlessevil@lemmy.one 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You are overlooking the links that are obfuscated through archive.org and archive.ph. The default sort algorithm for that page on lemmygrad.ml is Active. Of the 40 links on that page, 7 are for rt.com and 2 are for grayzone. So 9/40 or 22.5% of the page is well-known propaganda and conspiracy theory outlets. I'm not even clicking through the links to the lesser-known outlets that are, in all likelihood, also conspiracy theorists and authoritarian propaganda.

If you haven't heard of grayzone I imagine you are still new to the tankieverse, so it isn't too late for you to leave before becoming fully indoctrinated and delusional.

[-] itchy_lizard@feddit.it 1 points 1 year ago

lol it's really not hard to learn information literacy. There are plenty of communists that appreciate leftist news but are not tankies.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2023
23 points (96.0% liked)

Asklemmy

43773 readers
1441 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS