this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2023
84 points (83.3% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35772 readers
1181 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

People use it like everyone fucking has the innate knowledge of every acronym out there

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lvxferre@lemmy.ml 86 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (6 children)

Here's an example. Let's say that you don't know how open source works, and I told you the following:

Why are you in Lemmy? It's open source so any hacker can screw with it, and infect your computer with viruses. You'll never know, right?

That's FUD: fear, uncertainty, and doubt. It's a disingenuous tactic to convince you to not do something, based on the following:

  • You fear a certain outcome. In this case, a computer virus.
  • That fear is vaguely associated with something that is uncertain for you. In this case, how a hacker could use Lemmy to inject viruses into your computer.
  • The odds of that outcome happening are doubtful; it may happen, it may not, otherwise you could call me out for not happening. In this case, even if you don't get a virus from using Lemmy, I can still say "well, some people get it, some don't, but let's play it safe and avoid Lemmy."

This shitty strategy is fairly used in the tech industry because most people are clueless about tech, but they know that it has a big impact on their lives. However you'll also see this in politics, religious debate (Pascal's Wager is FUD), and others.

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 30 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Literally all VPN sponsored segments on YouTube.

[–] lvxferre@lemmy.ml 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yup. There are reasons to use a VPN, mind you; but they involve the person actually knowing the risk, when it applies, and taking a cost vs. risk judgment. The FUD in those sponsors is basically "you don't know so you might be at risk, subscribe to our VPN juuuuust in case".

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

They straight out lie in those ads though. Like for example VPNs don't protect your privacy at all when you're browsing. Just because it says private in their name doesn't mean you're anonymous. Cookies and trackers work all the same via a VPN.

[–] bigboismith@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Or the biggest thing people forget, being logged in.

[–] rishado@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That's an exaggeration though, most of them are coming at you with the 'hey! You can watch netflix germany now!" rather than 'hackers are coming to get you'

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 11 months ago

Yeah they have all kinda changed their tune after Tom Scott came out saying they were all straight out lies. https://youtu.be/WVDQEoe6ZWY?si=Gnrk4Bx1kdFQStJP

After this video I could tell you tubers changed their ads. They still lie, but much less.

[–] DeltaTangoLima@reddrefuge.com 9 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I'd say the 'D' (hah!) is more about making you doubt your position or thoughts on the matter. In your example, it'd make you doubt your choice to try using Lemmy, because of the fear and uncertainty.

[–] HerrBeter@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

It's part of the short and distort tactic too, https://realpeoples.media/the-basics-on-cointelpro-and-how-to-counter-it/

I feel like tesla uses it to fight against Unions in Sweden

[–] force@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

This shitty strategy is fairly used in the tech industry because most people are clueless about tech

Ah, so like every manager and client to ever exist in software development. I see

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 39 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Fear. Uncertainty. Doubt.

It’s sometimes used as a noun for things that cause FUD, too.

[–] DrBob@lemmy.ca 33 points 11 months ago

As others have said Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt.

It entered tech lingo way back in the 90s when Microsoft was fighting an early wave of Linux on desktop. They would troll and present themselves as a reliable alternative.

They weren't the first to do it. IBM's unofficial motto in the 70s was "nobody gets fired for going with IBM".

[–] uservoid1@lemmy.world 26 points 11 months ago
[–] Clav64@lemmy.ml 25 points 11 months ago (1 children)

In a modern internet context:

Fear. Uncertainty. Doubt.

Often used in crypto circles when a shitty project is being accused of being a rug pull. The scammer may say "it's just FUD, ignore it".

On 'the street', if I called someone a fud, it is calling them an idiot.

[–] Mr_Blott@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Is that just a Scottish thing, ya fud?

[–] redballooon@lemm.ee 25 points 11 months ago

Guess you’re one of today’s lucky 10000

[–] Nollij@sopuli.xyz 12 points 11 months ago

Others have answered it pretty well, but here's a more specific example:

In the long, long ago, IBM was the biggest seller of computer equipment, and by a wide margin. They alone decided the majority of standards in use, as well as what was coming soon. Anticompetitive monopoly tactics were standard there. For the vast majority of customers, you absolutely HAD to be compatible with whatever IBM was selling.

When one of IBM's competitors would introduce a new and desirable product, IBM would often issue a press release. They would say that they have something similar in the works, and it won't be compatible with the other brand. The safe option would be to wait for IBM to release theirs rather than take a risk on a whole new ecosystem. This was all despite the fact that IBM never actually had said product in development.

As a result, the customers would be afraid of being stuck on something incompatible, with an uncertain future. They wouldn't buy it, but they would continue to buy their existing IBM options. Eventually the other product would fold (proving their fears correct), and they'd forget what IBM promised.

[–] 520@kbin.social 10 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

It means "Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt".

It's a modern kind of shit talking employed by large corporations in conjunction with astro turfing (pretending to be an unbiased commentator, when you're really as biased as can be) to dissuade people from going to a competitor.

Because saying stuff like "I dunno dude, there's been reports of a lot of problems with Product X" is a lot more persuasive than "Product X sux!!!", especially when you don't know the poster was paid by Company Y, a competitor, to say it.

[–] adam_y@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Fud means cunt, just like every other word.

[–] Oyster_Lust@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Are you calling every word cunt? I can probably think of 5 words that aren't cunt.

[–] presbypenguin@reddthat.com 2 points 11 months ago
[–] ARk@lemm.ee 5 points 11 months ago (2 children)

In what context is this? I have never heard of FUD before in my life. Why the heck does Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt need to be arranged into an acronym?

[–] OneCardboardBox@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 11 months ago

It's common in communities where rigid adherence to a set of beliefs is necessary to enforce cohesion. It's commonly used to avoid engagement with "Facts U Dislike" (haha) by terminating all meaningful discussion.

Part of a flat earth forum and you're posting an experiment you performed that suggests the earth is round? You're spreading FUD that should be ignored.

Posting on a crypto shitcoins discord about how this kinda looks like a scam and maybe it's not a good investment? That's also FUD. You're just mad that everyone else is going to be rich.

[–] Aabbcc@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Because posters on crypto/investing forums needed to refer to it frequently

[–] mateomaui@reddthat.com 2 points 11 months ago

Pretty much, right there with HODL.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I had to look this up the other day and found it annoying. Absolutely feels like something not common enough to abbreviate to me

[–] LordOfTheChia@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

It depends on when you were around and reading geeky news sites. FUD came up often on Slashdot in relation to Microsoft:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fear,_uncertainty,_and_doubt#Microsoft

and the SCO v. IBM section are relevant.

[–] magnetosphere@kbin.social 3 points 11 months ago

I keep thinking it’s FOD (foreign object damage) which is why you don’t want small, hard objects on a runway or something. Stuff like bullet casings can get sucked into a jet engine, and cause FOD that takes a plane out of service.

Then I notice that FOD doesn’t make any sense in context, reread the sentence, and realize it’s FUD. Whoops.

[–] Tronn4@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

We don't sell Duff here, we sell Fudd!

[–] mojo@lemm.ee 3 points 11 months ago

Bullshit people push to agree with their viewpoints that make other things look bad/scary/insecure/etc

[–] snausagesinablanket@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Flowers Ultimately Die.

[–] x4740N@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Elmer Fud ?

[–] Brainsploosh@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The best thing about abbreviations is that they are entirely contextual, which means that if it isn't obvious what's meant, you can make up your own meaning and wonder/ask why the other person is using it so very wrong.

There's even an abbreviation for it: TLB, which in this context means Three Letter Bullshit.

[–] theamigan@lemmy.dynatron.me 2 points 11 months ago

TLB will always be translation lookaside buffer, sorry.

[–] Nastybutler@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Was it quicker to make a post asking random people on the internet, and waiting for a factual response, than to type the same question into a search engine?

[–] kSPvhmTOlwvMd7Y7E@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

It was quicker and i had more fun.

[–] feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

oh we fucking
we fucking alright

load more comments
view more: next ›