174
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by Waldowal@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

In unrelated news, Google Maps site traffic from North Korea sees odd spike.

all 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] MamboGator@lemmy.world 107 points 11 months ago

Kim Jong Un went on to say "President Biden and Kamala Harris were in the White House making foreign policy and I saw one of the policies and the policy looked at me."

[-] Stalinwolf@lemmy.ca 19 points 11 months ago

The policy looked at you?!

[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 19 points 11 months ago

Sarah, give me superintendent Chalmers.

[-] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 8 points 11 months ago

Thanks, Supernintendo Chalmers!

[-] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 67 points 11 months ago

Yeah I can go on Google maps too Kim

[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 24 points 11 months ago

It’s North Korea, we might be talking about Map Quest.

[-] bedrooms@kbin.social 11 points 11 months ago

You are an elite spy now

[-] silverbax@lemmy.world 43 points 11 months ago
[-] ptz@dubvee.org 81 points 11 months ago
[-] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 21 points 11 months ago

Wow! Nice.

BetterThanTheJokeIWasGoingToMake.gif

[-] ptz@dubvee.org 12 points 11 months ago

It's an oldie but a goodie. lol Couldn't help myself.

[-] Akasazh@feddit.nl 1 points 11 months ago

It's there a /c/retiredgifs?

[-] burntbutterbiscuits@sh.itjust.works 0 points 11 months ago

Yet another photo that proves the earth is flat

[-] saltnotsugar@lemm.ee 9 points 11 months ago

(Link to Google maps)

[-] carl_dungeon@lemmy.world 31 points 11 months ago

Cool, Google maps has that too, glad they’ve reached the year 1998!

[-] GlitchyDigiBun@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 11 months ago

Gmap data is dated around sensitive sites and they have to request DoD clearance to update that type of sat imagery, and even then objects can be blurred or even photoshopped by the DoD before google is allowed to post the update, and by then any intel even unedited is OBE. It makes sense that a country would want their own, up-to-date system.

[-] nucleative@lemmy.world 28 points 11 months ago

Ok, release a pic with better resolution than a commercial photo sat

Narrator: They didn't because they don't have it

[-] MeanEYE@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

Even if they did, they wouldn't. Analysts would jump right on analyzing the image to as high details as possible to figure out capabilities of their satellites and they don't want that. Kind of like how Russia faked their military capability number of times, especially with airplanes.

[-] nucleative@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Kim Jong Il launches a lot of little rockets to make sure the word can see what his capabilities are, haha.

I kind of think he has put his county in the position where it must prove it before anybody considers it a threat. Or else he would not have felt the need to tell everybody he can take pictures now.

[-] Creat@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 11 months ago

Oh they can't do that, wouldn't want anyone else getting their top secret information they clearly got from the photos.

[-] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 27 points 11 months ago

I've photographed the White House too, but my tour didn't include the Pentagon.

The satellite itself is not a threat but the rocket that launched it is concerning.

[-] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

It would be a real shame if some random "debris" knocked it out of orbit. A real shame.

A sattelite is only as good as your ability to maintain it.

[-] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 11 months ago

We don't need anymore anti satellite missile demonstrations. It makes way too damn much space debris.

[-] AphoticDev@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 11 months ago

Knocking things around in orbit is a terrible idea that only adds to the current near crisis we have with space junk. So yes, it would be a real shame if something messed with the orbit of any satellite, one that could cost hundreds of millions in damages or even loss of life.

[-] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

Was it China that destroyed a satellite in orbit and everyone got mad because it flung so much shit at other satellites

[-] NegativeLookBehind@kbin.social 24 points 11 months ago

In other news, the rest of the world has had the same photos for decades.

[-] praise_idleness@sh.itjust.works 23 points 11 months ago

It's like they're playing Tropico and they just reached Cold war era.

[-] wildcardology@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago

To be fair Google maps is not real time.

[-] MeanEYE@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago

Neither is their satellite. They can download data only when their satellite flies over NK or one of their partners if they have partnerships at all.

[-] TIMMAY@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

I know absolutely nothing about this subject, but I saw the saveitforparts youtube channel guy try to listen for this sat and he didnt pick anything up. Does anyone know if its likely that if the sat was up and functioning, hobbyists would at least have a good chance of detecting it?

[-] Colour_me_triggered@lemm.ee 6 points 11 months ago

How does a photo of Biden having a tuggy help the DPRK?

[-] pan_troglodytes@programming.dev 6 points 11 months ago

suuuuurrre it did.

[-] _number8_@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago
this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2023
174 points (94.8% liked)

News

23266 readers
3224 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS