this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2023
201 points (97.6% liked)

Asklemmy

43945 readers
622 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I posted this question because I once saw a tweet that said something like:

"If you use adblock, you don't care about creator's point blank"

What is your opinion on this? Do you agree with them?

(page 5) 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

I do everything under the sun pretty much. Ublock origin, NoScript, chameleon extensions on Librewolf (and others). I “subscribe” to YouTube channels via rss feeds. Open up the newsboat feed reader from my terminal and an extension called “Alter” redirects me to an invidious instance. NoScript blocks everything pretty much as I just need the url. Then I use yt-dlp with the sponsorblock flag.

I only visit YouTube when I have a bunch of new “subs” that I found through word of mouth (reading blogs, HN, Mastodon, Lemmy, etc). I could just use invidious rss feeds, but if the instance goes down I would have to start all over again. There are other ways of achieving this same effect, but this is how I choose to consume yt now.

[–] hendrik@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not a hardcore capitalist. Also i can't watch all the ads the corporations would like to feed me every day. So i'm fine with using an adblocker. Don't give stuff out for free on the internet if you don't like this. But since you ask: I really don't like that strategy to commercialize everything, to finance everything by selling ads and user data...

[–] Owell1984@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

undefined> capitalist

are you a capitalist tho? I mean, I consider myself a capitalist and let's just say people don't agree with me a lot here. anyways, how has this platform been treating you

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rlaimondas@venera.social 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

@tsukii I don't, because TROMJARO do everything fir me.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] speaker_hat@lemmy.one 0 points 1 year ago

I don't, because I know that ads are part of free content "agreement"

[–] MashingBundle@lemmy.fmhy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yes. I don't give a shit if it's immoral.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ruckblack@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The internet's practically unusable without it now. We'll always be in this rat race with advertisers and such. If I have the technical ability to circumvent every advertisement, I'll do it. Advertisers get plenty from the people without the tech know-how, and I directly support creators that I want to support. Maybe a bit of a "f you I got mine" position, but whatever. Zero guilt.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›