234

Wrongfully jailed for 20 years, Australia’s ‘most hated woman’ likely to receive record compensation (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 10 months ago by throws_lemy@lemmy.nz to c/world@lemmy.world

10 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 10 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 60 points 10 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:

But on Thursday, Folbigg’s convictions were quashed by an appeals court following an inquiry that examined new scientific evidence and found there was reasonable doubt of her guilt.

Folbigg’s original guilty verdict was not based on medical evidence that explained how her four young children – Caleb, Patrick, Sarah and Laura – died between 1989 and 1999 aged between 19 days and 18 months.

The case against Folbigg also relied on Meadow’s Law – a controversial and now discredited precept that three or more sudden infant deaths in one family were murders until proven otherwise.

She called out misogynistic reasoning in Folbigg’s case, noting normal behaviour such as working part-time and putting her children in childcare so she could go to the gym were viewed painted as suspicious in court.

A breakthrough came in 2018 when research by a team of experts, including immunologist Prof Carola Vinuesa, found Folbigg and her two daughters – Laura and Sarah – carried a rare genetic variation known as CALM2-G114R.

The genetic evidence and fresh medical research by an international team of scientists – which included identifying that the two boys, Caleb and Patrick, carried variants in a gene known as BSN “shown to cause early onset lethal epilepsy in mice” – were again raised in another inquiry earlier this year.

The original article contains 1,129 words, the summary contains 217 words. Saved 81%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] YottaDren@lemmy.world 90 points 10 months ago

Holy cow. Meadow's law sounds like it's for punishing people with genetic diseases or the worst luck

[-] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 27 points 10 months ago

Meadow’s Law – a controversial and now discredited precept that three or more sudden infant deaths in one family were murders until proven otherwise.

This is like the insidious logic applied in the name of terrorism and pedophilia — "innocent until proven guilty... unless 3 infants die... Then it's zero-evidence auto-murder, and may god have mercy on your soul".

[-] brukernavn@lemm.ee 9 points 10 months ago

Meadow’s Law sounds like something a James Bond villain would say. Because it is. It’s based on this quote from Goldfinger:

Mr Bond, they have a saying in Chicago: Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. The third time it’s enemy action.

[-] Clent@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

Being burned for witchcraft seems worse.

Excellent anti-death penalty here. A place like Texas would have already executed her.

[-] Zagorath@aussie.zone 7 points 10 months ago

For what it's worth, Meadow's law is described by the article as a "precept" because it was never an actual legislated law. Just a concept thought up by a now-discredited British paediatrician. Even taking it on its own terms, it's a "law" in the way "Betteridge's Law" or "Cunningham's Law" are laws.

[-] Mothra@mander.xyz 35 points 10 months ago

What a nightmare

[-] flathead@lemm.ee 30 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I thought Lindy Chamberlain was "Australia's most hated woman"..... wait...huh?

'The police were feeding information to the press': The Australian mother wrongly convicted of murder

https://www.bbc.com/culture/article/20231019-the-mother-wrongly-convicted-of-murder-who-always-insisted-a-dingo-killed-her-baby

oh… maybe it was Julia Gillard then… https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Misogyny_Speech

now this one's pardoned, who will the Murdochs be nominating for the "Australia's most hated woman" title?

[-] TheFonz@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago

I recall listening to the This Is Criminal podcast a few years back and hearing Carol discuss the research on the case. So glad it came through in the end, but she had to undergo a herculean effort to get people to listen to her about the exonerating research.

[-] sir_pronoun@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Jfc

this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2023

234 points (98.8% liked)

World News

38969 readers

1964 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.