this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2023
2196 points (98.4% liked)

Memes

45729 readers
1109 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NutWrench@lemmy.ml 14 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Google's search engine has gotten lazy, with the first dozen or more hits being YouTube and Reddit results.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] lntl@lemmy.ml 14 points 11 months ago

Nowadays i find myself leaning the old ways: browser bookmarks. Not long ago, search was so good that i stopped using them.

[–] problematicPanther@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago (6 children)

ive not used it in a long time, so I'm ootl. What's going on with their search?

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Diabolo96@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Yeah, If the search is about something relatively obscure then 50% of the links are random letters and numbers or worse, believable looking links that are riddled with viruses.

[–] finkrat@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I use DDG and it's fine? Just use a different search engine

[–] huginn@feddit.it 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

In my experience DDG and Google are pretty close to the same quality. IE neither is good.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 12 points 11 months ago (6 children)

Which is why I stopped going since about 4 years ago now. One day I just went to a different mall, and never looked back

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago (3 children)

ITT: people who don't know that DuckDuckGo is just Bing with a bird on it

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I think that’s an oversimplification. I get different results.

Wiki claims (with five sources I didn’t check):

DuckDuckGo's results are a compilation of "over 400" sources according to itself, including Bing, Yahoo! Search BOSS, Wolfram Alpha, Yandex, and its own web crawler (the DuckDuckBot); but none from Google.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

The old "Bing is just like Google" ad copy is getting truer and truer in a bad way.

[–] Barometer3689@feddit.nl 11 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Yep, I switched to kagi a while back and couldn’t be happier with the results. If you don’t want to be the product, maybe consider paying for search?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BenLeMan@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

All the people complaining must not be using verbatim search (in search tools, toggle from "all results.")

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 12 points 11 months ago

Verbatim search? As in direct string comparison? What is this 1999?

[–] crony@lemmy.cronyakatsuki.xyz 10 points 11 months ago (11 children)

This is why I have been using aselfhosted searxng instance for over a year and half now.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] spudwart@spudwart.com 10 points 11 months ago (2 children)

This post but replace google search with the general internet.

Nearly every place that feels like the old internet is not as popular.

I used to think that was a bad thing, I'm starting to think maybe I've just been pushing aside the reality that when the internet was good, it wasn't as popular.

[–] Overzeetop@sopuli.xyz 8 points 11 months ago

Not popular- commercial. The early internet had effectively no profit motive. As it aged there was a modicum of balance between use and profit - a good site drives customers. Now there are a preponderance of sites which exist only to scrape pennies off advertisers and have no useful content except that which is required to garner a click from a search engine in hopes you will accidentally create an advertising impression.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Adalast@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago (3 children)

This is such an apt analogy. I only use it because I have a couple hundred tabs open in Chrome and I am too lazy to port them all over to FF. Even then, I usually have to be really manipulative to the search algorithm to get what I want from general searches and heaven forbid I want to find something that is even the least but taboo. I just use DuckDuckGo for those searches, though it struggles sometimes too.

I know I need to swap over to FF entirely, but there is just so much, from shifting my PW bank to the hundreds of tabs and thousands of bookmarks. Does anyone know of any FOSS or FF extensions that can smooth that process?

[–] GenePull@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

Bit-warden for password manager, FOSS cross platform. FF should import all the bookmarks. I'd save all open tabs to a new bookmark folder before transfer then open that folder after.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Saki@monero.town 9 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Tor Browser is planning to remove Google from the search engine options a user can choose: https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/applications/tor-browser/-/issues/41835

There some say brave onion + no JS is good: https://search.brave4u7jddbv7cyviptqjc7jusxh72uik7zt6adtckl5f4nwy2v72qd.onion/

Mullvad team seems to be considering 4 possible options:


PS: Not disgussing ddg / ddg onion too much, basically because ddg is the long-time default search engine of TB. Most TB users assume ddg is a decent, standard, generic option, esp. its non-JS version.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›