this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2024
202 points (94.3% liked)

Technology

59554 readers
3385 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Volkswagen says it’s putting ChatGPT in its cars for “enriching conversations”::Volkswagen is putting ChatGPT into its cars starting in the second quarter of 2024. The feature is being considered for the US, but plans have yet to be finalized.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 105 points 10 months ago (1 children)

no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no

[–] silas@programming.dev 38 points 10 months ago

I found this on the web for, “no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no”

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 96 points 10 months ago (3 children)

I just want to fucking drive. I don't need a conversation. Can we stop listening to dumbasses fresh out of their MBA program?

[–] takeda@lemmy.world 48 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

It really feels like 2000 bubble. Everyone seems to be so invested in it, but more and more looks like this will burst and take many companies with it.

[–] z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml 23 points 10 months ago

Oh god please, p PLEASE just burst the AI hype bubble now.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SVcross@lemmy.world 53 points 10 months ago (4 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Gamoc@lemmy.world 53 points 10 months ago

Perhaps one of the stupidest fucking ideas ever. "Let's add more and more and more distractions for drivers. A touch screen so they have to stop looking at the road! An AI to distract them with inane rambling, because we think that's an enriching conversation since we are also robots. Add that to the ads on radio fucking with you by being different volumes and having car beeping noises and shit in them and WE WILL FINALLY ERADICATE THE DRIVERS"

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 50 points 10 months ago (2 children)

So, they’re fresh off of rolling back their attempt to make everything a touch interface, which everyone hated… and they’re electing to go down yet another poorly-considered human interface rabbit hole?

That’s a bold move, cotton.

I’ll stick with my “stupid” 2003 Jetta 1.8T, thanks.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TheImpressiveX@lemmy.ml 38 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Why do we need "enriching conversations" built in a car at all? Aren't you supposed to be focusing on the road?

VW promises it won’t force you to create a new account or install any apps.

Not yet, anyway.

[–] CrowAirbrush@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

They saw us get angry at a heating subscription and decided we are tiktok brained idiots who lack the skill to be social with humans and found another potential subscription service justification that causes less anger?

[–] Kolrami@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Conversation keeps me alert if I've been driving a long time. I don't know if artificial conversation would be as effective, but at least it's an option.

[–] bappity@lemmy.world 30 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I'm sorry Dave. I can't let you do that

[–] BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago

Lock the doors VW, we're being car jacked.

lol no, I've seen you, you're not jacked at all rofl

[–] boredtortoise@lemm.ee 29 points 10 months ago

Volkswagen, voice command, emergency brake

"As a language model I..."

[–] Amir@lemmy.ml 29 points 10 months ago (3 children)

You WILL have AI in every device you own and you WILL enjoy it

[–] dabster291@lemmy.zip 12 points 10 months ago

wrong, you won't own your devices

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 12 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

The AI will be watching you to make sure you're enjoying it.

[–] Nommer@sh.itjust.works 5 points 10 months ago

Drink your verification can verified by AI.

[–] ErinCrush@lemm.ee 19 points 10 months ago (2 children)
[–] grayman@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I think of it more as the inbred child of down syndrome siblings that eats lead paint.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago (1 children)

VW: so we listened to our customers, and we're announcing we're transitioning back to physical buttons on the steering wheel

People: yes!

VW: ...and integrating chatGPT into our cars!

ffs VW. I hope it's opt-in at least.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mtchristo@lemm.ee 17 points 10 months ago

DotCom bubble 2.0

[–] Thann@lemmy.ml 16 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Who doesn't want spyware in their car?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SomeGuy69@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago

"You haven't paid your leasing fee this month, ChatGPT will now start to tell bad dad jokes"

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Should we invest the money from R&D so that our cars aren't just hard plastic shit boxes? No! Give them AI!

[–] spudwart@spudwart.com 4 points 10 months ago

Alternatively, we could take money away cars and put it towards public transit infrastructure

[–] Dasnap@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago

They can enrich deez nuts in their mouth.

[–] SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip 10 points 10 months ago

This is so incredibly stupid. If I want to use ChatGPT, I'll use ChatGPT. Not, "If I want to communicate while driving, I'll use ChatGPT."

[–] samokosik@lemmynsfw.com 10 points 10 months ago

I don't need to chat with my car, I have friends. I need 3 pedals, steering wheel and gear lever, so I can use a car as a car.

[–] aluminium@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

Ok, VW what can you tell me about Dieselgate

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] FishFace@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Remarkably stupid take. It's produced by big-data companies because you need a lot of data to feed it but that doesn't make it "surveillance technology". Stable Diffusion wasn't trained on the kind of data she's talking about, and it can't be used to surveil you either. ChatGPT no more permits surveillance of its users than does chatting with a real person.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Doorbook@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Can Firefox make a car or something

[–] z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml 7 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Uh yeah... Mozilla's working on advancing their own AI products ATM, so maybe be careful what you wish for?

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

At least Mozilla's is opt-in by the sounds of it, runs entirely locally, and only with your own data that you consciously feed it.

If we're being pragmatic, the cat is out of the bag now. "AI" is here to stay. And I'd rather use a privacy-respecting, locally-run instance that doesn't send personally identifiable data, as opposed to using one from Google or Microsoft.

[–] lemann@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 10 months ago

Mozilla's at least used local AI so far, although it's unclear whether they will stay on that route.

My opinion on LLMs is pretty much local only or no thanks 👍

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] gerryflap@feddit.nl 6 points 10 months ago

I'm very interested in machine learning, or AI as it's usually referred to in hyped-up content, and have also done research in the topic of generative AI. It hurts me so much that such interesting and useful technology has become another empty hype word. Nobody is waiting for this kind of gimmicky shit. It does nothing but hurt the public's view of this technology, similar to all the copyright issues and privacy concerns. Why must companies take things that can ultimately do something good in some cases and apply it to absolutely everything with no regards for the impact on their customers.

Most companies don't need "AI" and would be much better of spending those resources on actually improving their products. Useful places for generative AI would be something like Photoshop incorporating it, or a video game with better AI or more natural NPC conversations. Not some gimmicky AI assistant in a car, or some annoying AI chat window bothering you when visiting a news site. Soon people will be completely done with all this gimmicky "AI" bullshit and the useful applications will constantly have to deal with the stigma created by these greedy mindless corporations forcing "AI" on everyone in places where it adds nothing.

[–] illi@lemm.ee 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I can see AI being a powerful tool but not for conversations - and certainly not enriching ones

[–] takeda@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I would imagine generative AI would be actually great at that particular use (more than programming for example), I'm just wondering though if they need ChatGPT for it.

[–] nezbyte@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

I’ve always wanted to be able to get information about landmarks as I drive. If I drive by something that has a Wikipedia entry my car should offer to read the summary to me. Unfortunately, ChatGPT will probably be saturated with hallucinated information for a fraction of the minor landmarks I inquire about.

[–] bassad@jlai.lu 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

so now in top of entertainement systems on videos, soundsystems, drivers will be distracted with bot conversations. Awesome.

thanks vw that is very useful... How to pay attention to the road, and others road users already fragile (pedestrians, cyclists, motocylists) on a 1,5T rolling living-room-sofa ?

A car is already too much considered as personnal property and "vital space", yeah it is a good idea to give drivers more of this "personnal bubble" feeling. /s if it was not explicit enough

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 3 points 10 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Volkswagen is jumping on the generative AI bandwagon by announcing plans to install OpenAI’s ChatGPT into its vehicles starting in the second quarter of 2024.

Vehicle owners can use the new super-powered voice assistant to control basic functions, like heating and air conditioning, or to answer “general knowledge questions.” (Though, given ChatGPT’s penchant for occasionally making stuff up, user discretion is advised.)

Most vehicle voice assistants are pretty rote, able to do things like turn on seat heaters or window defrosters — but lack conversational skills and typically fall short of more complex navigational requests.

ChatGPT and other large language model chatbots have been known to serve up false information, and OpenAI is being targeted in a number of defamation and copyright infringement lawsuits.

The company’s Cerence Chat Pro software will enhance VW’s voice assistant so it can “provide relevant responses to nearly every query imaginable.”

Despite being one of the biggest automakers in the world, VW had a rough 2023, including disappointing sales growth, software malfunctions, and layoffs.


The original article contains 542 words, the summary contains 168 words. Saved 69%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 3 points 10 months ago

inb4 someone gets arrested for some shit they admitted to a chat bot in their car

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

First thought: out of touch execs adding features no one asked forand can find on their own if they really want it to justify price increases and higher profits.

Second thought: what kind of AI software do they really want to use that they are using chatgpt to justify having the hardware there for?

Maybe to offer self driving support in the future. More likely to improve the quality of data they can sell.

Know what feature I'd really like to see in new cars? No data connections other than maybe Bluetooth, though I don't have much confidence they'll use an implementation that isn't riddled with long-fixed security holes. Though a secure Bluetooth implementation could be a feature! Same with secure remote unlock that uses cryptography instead of a signal that can be sniffed and spoofed. Also the ability to blast hot air at my windshield without having to run the AC. Physical buttons for all car and environmental controls, plus volume, track skip and ff 15 seconds that Spotify can understand. And a screw hole intended for a phone mount.

Don't worry about a touch screen, you (most car companies in general) suck at both designing software and choosing hardware that isn't underpowered for what you want to do with it. I don't want a piece of tech that is just going to annoy me every time I have to use it.

[–] BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago

Remember 10 years ago when everything more technologically advanced than a flat toaster had to contain 3d printed parts?

Pepperidge farm remembers

load more comments
view more: next ›