this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2024
110 points (96.6% liked)

Star Trek

10608 readers
79 users here now

r/startrek: The Next Generation

Star Trek news and discussion. No slash fic...

Maybe a little slash fic.


New to Star Trek and wondering where to start?


Rules

1 Be constructiveAll posts/comments must be thoughtful and balanced.


2 Be welcomingIt is important that everyone from newbies to OG Trekkers feel welcome, no matter their gender, sexual orientation, religion or race.


3 Be truthfulAll posts/comments must be factually accurate and verifiable. We are not a place for gossip, rumors, or manipulative or misleading content.


4 Be niceIf a polite way cannot be found to phrase what it is you want to say, don't say anything at all. Insulting or disparaging remarks about any human being are expressly not allowed.


5 SpoilersUtilize the spoiler system for any and all spoilers relating to the most recently-aired episodes, as well as previews for upcoming episodes. There is no formal spoiler protection for episodes/films after they have been available for approximately one week.


6 Keep on-topicAll submissions must be directly about the Star Trek franchise (the shows, movies, books etc.). Off-topic discussions are welcome at c/quarks.


7 MetaQuestions and concerns about moderator actions should be brought forward via DM.


Upcoming Episodes

Date Episode Title
11-21 LD 5x06 "Of Gods and Angles"
11-28 LD 5x07 "Fully Dilated"
12-05 LD 5x08 "Upper Decks"
12-12 LD 5x09 "Fissue Quest"
12-19 LD 5x10 "The New Next Generation"

Episode Discussion Archive


In Production

Strange New Worlds (2025)

Section 31 (2025-01-24)

Starfleet Academy (TBA)

In Development

Untitled comedy series


Wondering where to stream a series? Check here.


Allied Discord Server


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

New ‘Star Trek’ In The Works With ‘Andor’ Director Toby Haynes On Board

https://deadline.com/2024/01/andor-toby-haynes-star-trek-movie-seth-grahame-smith-writing-1235712646/

@startrek #StarTrek

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 30 points 10 months ago (3 children)

It's beginning to feel like Charlie Brown and the football at this point, but let's see if they can actually get this one off the ground.

[–] billmason@mastodon.social 10 points 10 months ago (4 children)

@ValueSubtracted @startrek
Basically where I'm also at.

Also, as someone noted in a Discord chat about it, "decades before" only gives you a small window between the start of the Kelvin universe and Trek '09, otherwise too far back and you're making a Prime Timeline movie. So that'll be interesting to see what they plan.

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

only gives you a small window between the start of the Kelvin universe and Trek '09,

I mean...we could all pretend the Kelvin timeline doesn't exist...

[–] M500@lemmy.ml 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I think the kelvin timeline is great for the sole fact that it is what peaked my interest in trek. I recently just finished watching everything trek and it was because the 09 movie was cool and got me to start watching the different tv series.

[–] mwest@toot.works 2 points 10 months ago (5 children)

@M500 @cm0002 I think that’s amazing and wonderful. Any Star Trek vehicle from any point can be anyone’s gateway. And that’s why it’s still here. Rock on you!

Watching squabbles over this stuff is depressing. I have specific Trek I’ll avoid, but that’s me, and bringing it up over and over in every conversation is lame.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I would take that with a grain of salt - it's a general-purpose Hollywood outlet reporting what their sources told them, so there could be room for inaccuracies.

They could also follow Simon Pegg's contention that the Kelvin and Prime timelines could be different at any point in history (which I support).

[–] billmason@mastodon.social 4 points 10 months ago

@ValueSubtracted @startrek Well like we said, all news about a Star Trek film comes with lots of salt onboard 😂

[–] halm@leminal.space 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

At this point the Kelvin timeline is just a handwavey excuse for recasting Kirk and crew of TOS and following movies. And a prequel to Kelvin is an excuse to recast those parts with younger actors.

Personally, I could care less about new movies featuring the TOS characters. Star trek evolved past them 30 years ago, I wish Hollywood would realise that.

[–] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Kelvin broke the seal on recasting, as it were.

If Discovery or SNW had been the first to recast Kirk, there would have been a revolt, but since Kelvin got us used to the idea people just kind of accept it.

[–] halm@leminal.space 3 points 10 months ago

Yeah, it was Pandora's recasting, and now all the Kirks and Spocks are loose on the world.

[–] VindictiveJudge@startrek.website 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

There are actually differences in the Prime and Kelvin timelines that happened before Nero's incursion. For instance, Kirk's date of birth is off by several months. They tried to justify that afterwards by saying something about the event sending shockwaves through time to change things before it even happened or something like that. The real reason probably lies in that interview where JJ Abrams admitted he never liked Star Trek, but you could argue that the removal of various down-stream time travel events, like the events of "The City on the Edge of Forever" likely not happening in the modified timeline, could actually cause retroactive changes to the timeline.

But anyway, the Kelvin timeline already diverges before the Kelvin-Narada thing, because reasons.

[–] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Another change is Enterprise being built on earth instead of in orbit.

I’m almost entirely sure that choice was because JJ Abrams wanted that visual in his movie. Justifications to Trek nerds were an afterthought.

[–] michaelgemar@mstdn.ca 4 points 10 months ago

@setsneedtofeed @startrek Which never made any sense in any timeline.

[–] evdo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 10 months ago

Yeah, I'll believe it when I see it.

[–] USSBurritoTruck@startrek.website 23 points 10 months ago (2 children)

image

As always, I will not actually believe there is a new Trek movie being made until my butt is in the seat, with a popcorn in one hand, Dr. Pepper in the second hand, opening credits already rolling on the screen.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] USSBurritoTruck@startrek.website 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Y'know, I don't think I've ever actually seen Mr. Pibb available here, but I still believe my having one at the theatre is more likely than there being a new Star Trek movie in theatres any time soon.

[–] evdo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They only sell it at Chipotle where I'm at. I'm tempted to order a box

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Remember when Chipotle was a good deal for a big burrito?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] beefcat@beehaw.org 2 points 10 months ago

They don't have Dr. Pepper at my movie theater so I guess this movie really is never seeing the light of day :/

[–] HWK_290@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Now this I'm interested in. Andor was a quite good and, importantly, character-driven study of a desperate man growing to challenge an insurmountable empire... You know, in contrast to the exhaustive world building and effects-heavy "pew pew" fan service that has become the rest of modern star wars

I dare say, I'd also enjoy this film much more than the nixed Tarantino film

[–] Orbituary@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

Andor was the best story of the Disney trash. I think anybody could watch it and be compelled. I think because Andor has a hard end in Rogue One, they need to go hard and establish him as a bad ass.

I'm sad to hear Tarantino got negged on ST though.

[–] maegul@lemmy.ml 12 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Anyone else bothered by yet another prequel? Enterprise, Kelvin films, Discovery (s1-2), strange new worlds … there’s clearly a hesitancy to do something new right?

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It doesn't bother me at all, because I don't think a fictional universe needs to have a "default" setting.

[–] maegul@lemmy.ml 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Aren’t prequels the default setting? What trek have we had since voyager that didn’t have a Spock or Soong in it?

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Lower Decks, Prodigy, Picard, late-period Discovery...is that enough? Should I continue?

[–] maegul@lemmy.ml 7 points 10 months ago (7 children)

is that enough? Should I continue?

There are more?

But to dig into this ...

  • Separating late-period from early period Discovery doesn't really work. As much as I like the time jump, it's pretty much the same show, and Burhnam is still Spock's sister.
  • Picard is still a relatively hard se-quel, which resonates with the essence of my argument ... plus it had a Soong. I'm not sure you can describe S3 as any less nostalgia baiting or digging into established IP than any prequel. Not sure Picard, especially S3, is a convincing example of "Star Trek doesn't have a default setting".

Which leaves Lower Decks and Prodigy ... which are by my reckoning the two relatively universally appreciated Trek projects since Voyager (at least amongst those that have watched them) ... which I would claim is not a coincidence (not that we all have to like the same things).

They're both animated too which I feel exemplifies the risk-aversion modern Trek production has to "new" projects/characters etc.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] beefcat@beehaw.org 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I'm OK with more prequels if it means letting Terry Matalas continue handling the post-TNG timeline.

[–] maegul@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago

I’m with you.

The fun thing about the Matalas post-TNG/legacy thing for me is that it nicely straddles the line between being new and nostalgic. Seven would be captain and a whole bunch of other stuff too would be new, but still connected to the TNG era past.

[–] Corgana@startrek.website 11 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I know people like to say Trek was meant for the small screen, but I honestly love all the (well, non Kelvin) movies and am very excited for this.

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 4 points 10 months ago

It's me. I'm people.

[–] Kushan@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The article seems to suggest this film is part of the Kelvin line.

[–] Corgana@startrek.website 5 points 10 months ago

In that case I regret ever being born

[–] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

What I liked most about Andor was how it felt perfectly at home in the Star Wars universe while also having its own distinct flavor.

A lot of modern Star Wars media just keeps leaning on references and recycling of old content. To quote RLM, “I saw things I know!” Andor stayed light on direct references and instead tried to have its own new ideas and visual designs that would fit in the universe.

If Hayes can do that with Trek, it will be very welcome.

[–] Donebrach@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Andor is probably the best thing to come of Disney Star Wars. If that quality persists I am very excited. If that quality does not persist still a win: more Star Trek.

I just hope whatever form it takes we lose the bizarrely shoehorned-in fictional culture of having a “number one” (literally only Picard used that nickname for Riker back in the day) and the equally annoying and cringey creation of the captain of the ship having a “go to warp” catchphrase.

[–] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 4 points 10 months ago

the bizarrely shoehorned-in fictional culture of having a “number one” (literally only Picard used that nickname for Riker back in the day)

Number One was "the first character Gene wrote into the script" of The Cage (the pilot episode of the original series), according to Majel Barrett Roddenberry.

There are also many other characters called Number One in Star Trek and elsewhere.

According to some sources, calling the second-in-command/executive/first officer "number one" might have historically been a thing in the British Navy, but i don't see a reliable source for that after a minute of searching so I'm not sure.

[–] triktrek@startrek.website 6 points 10 months ago

This is the same guy who directed the Black Mirror's Star Trek homage episode "USS Callistor"

[–] billmason@mastodon.social 3 points 10 months ago
[–] xilliah@beehaw.org 3 points 10 months ago

I'm a trekkie but can't we come up with more new stuff

[–] crazyminner@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

What the hell!! I want more Stange new worlds! It's probably one of my favorite of the treks.

Please just make more SNW.

[–] billmason@mastodon.social 8 points 10 months ago

@crazyminner @startrek This doesn't have anything to do with SNW. Season 3 of SNW started filming a few weeks ago.

[–] halm@leminal.space 4 points 10 months ago

No need to worry, TV and movie Trek are usually produced independently of each other. You can have one and the other.

load more comments
view more: next ›